Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 40591 - 40600 of 58492 for speedy trial.

CA Blank Order
also appears to be claiming that his plea was not knowing, intelligent, and voluntary because trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103136 - 2013-10-17

William J. Schimmels v. John A. Noordover
Schimmels moved for reconsideration or a new trial. He sought reinstatement of the stricken Conclusions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20710 - 2006-01-24

Edward A. Hinrichs v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company
was not an underinsured motorist as defined in the policies. The trial court granted American Family’s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2720 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
on October 13 to try resolving the case because it would not be able to hold the factfinding/trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=511554 - 2022-04-20

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
intercourse, and threw her cell phone out the window.2 ¶3 The case proceeded to a jury trial in January
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=839487 - 2024-08-20

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
law. Also, because the exercise of discretion is so essential to the trial court’s functioning, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=62517 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] NOTICE
impose. That argument failed below because the trial court found that Zwiacher “fail[ed] utterly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35766 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Monica M. Blazekovic v. City of Milwaukee
(American Family) appeal the trial court’s denial of their summary declaratory judgment motion seeking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14199 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Milton A. Bumpers
.” The trial court found that the request occurred “[a]bout three minutes later.” No. 01-0671 4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3707 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Liborio Cianciolo v. Antonina Cianciolo
judgment is to “avoid trials where there is nothing to try.” Caulfield v. Caulfield, 183 Wis. 2d 83, 91
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14903 - 2017-09-21