Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4061 - 4070 of 68466 for did.
Search results 4061 - 4070 of 68466 for did.
State v. Jeffrey A. Huck
that the defendants did not receive ineffective assistance because they have failed to show prejudice as required
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17515 - 2005-03-31
that the defendants did not receive ineffective assistance because they have failed to show prejudice as required
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17515 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jeffrey A. Huck
that the defendants did not receive ineffective assistance because they have failed to show prejudice as required
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17516 - 2005-03-31
that the defendants did not receive ineffective assistance because they have failed to show prejudice as required
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17516 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and Officer Yandel knocked on the door, which was answered by Matalonis, who was out of breath, but did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132150 - 2017-09-21
and Officer Yandel knocked on the door, which was answered by Matalonis, who was out of breath, but did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132150 - 2017-09-21
David Pagel v. Robert Gaffney
the court did not explicitly rule on these items, and they may be affected by the court’s resolution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14759 - 2005-03-31
the court did not explicitly rule on these items, and they may be affected by the court’s resolution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14759 - 2005-03-31
State v. Ronald L. Ragan
that the retrial did not violate Ragan's protection against double jeopardy. Second, Ragan
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10347 - 2005-03-31
that the retrial did not violate Ragan's protection against double jeopardy. Second, Ragan
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10347 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI APP 8
the circuit court did not erroneously exercise its discretion in admitting certain of the pornography
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30932 - 2014-09-15
the circuit court did not erroneously exercise its discretion in admitting certain of the pornography
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30932 - 2014-09-15
State v. Gerald P.
, the trial court did not lose competency to proceed. Thus, the order is affirmed. I. Background
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20442 - 2006-02-13
, the trial court did not lose competency to proceed. Thus, the order is affirmed. I. Background
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20442 - 2006-02-13
2007 WI APP 242
” and a “small shriek” coming from upstairs. Travis said he heard Markwardt say, “Why did you do that?” Travis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30711 - 2007-11-27
” and a “small shriek” coming from upstairs. Travis said he heard Markwardt say, “Why did you do that?” Travis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30711 - 2007-11-27
David Pagel v. Robert Gaffney
the court did not explicitly rule on these items, and they may be affected by the court’s resolution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14726 - 2005-03-31
the court did not explicitly rule on these items, and they may be affected by the court’s resolution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14726 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jeffrey A. Huck
that the defendants did not receive ineffective assistance because they have failed to show prejudice as required
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17519 - 2005-03-31
that the defendants did not receive ineffective assistance because they have failed to show prejudice as required
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17519 - 2005-03-31