Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 40661 - 40670 of 65151 for or b.
Search results 40661 - 40670 of 65151 for or b.
State v. Kenneth L. Dade
will not be published. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.23(1)(b)4. [1] This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15896 - 2009-09-14
will not be published. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.23(1)(b)4. [1] This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15896 - 2009-09-14
COURT OF APPEALS
will not be published. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.23(1)(b)5. [1] All references to the Wisconsin Statutes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76820 - 2012-01-23
will not be published. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.23(1)(b)5. [1] All references to the Wisconsin Statutes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76820 - 2012-01-23
Peggy A. Pikalek v. City of Milwaukee
)(b)5, Stats. [1] In light of our conclusion that § 36-13-2-e governs, we do not address
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8254 - 2005-03-31
)(b)5, Stats. [1] In light of our conclusion that § 36-13-2-e governs, we do not address
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8254 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
cited for persuasive value under Wis. Stat. Rule 809.23(3)(b)). Additionally, the presentence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91221 - 2013-01-08
cited for persuasive value under Wis. Stat. Rule 809.23(3)(b)). Additionally, the presentence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91221 - 2013-01-08
COURT OF APPEALS
will not be published. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.23(1)(b)5. [1] References to the Wisconsin Statutes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=114853 - 2013-04-15
will not be published. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.23(1)(b)5. [1] References to the Wisconsin Statutes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=114853 - 2013-04-15
State v. Corbin Jones
affirmed. This opinion will not be published. See Rule 809.23(1)(b)4, Stats
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8438 - 2012-12-18
affirmed. This opinion will not be published. See Rule 809.23(1)(b)4, Stats
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8438 - 2012-12-18
State v. Doran J. London
)(b)5, Stats.
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8547 - 2012-04-18
)(b)5, Stats.
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8547 - 2012-04-18
County of Jefferson v. Leslie L. Crook
)(b)4, Stats. [1] This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to § 752.31(2)(c), Stats.
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10934 - 2005-03-31
)(b)4, Stats. [1] This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to § 752.31(2)(c), Stats.
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10934 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI App 51
Fisher & Nichols S.C. of Milwaukee, and Michael B. Apfeld of Godfrey & Kahn S.C. of Milwaukee
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192729 - 2018-08-22
Fisher & Nichols S.C. of Milwaukee, and Michael B. Apfeld of Godfrey & Kahn S.C. of Milwaukee
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192729 - 2018-08-22
[PDF]
Frontsheet
a firearm subsequent to the conviction for the felony or other crime, as specified in sub. (1)(a) or (b
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=321474 - 2021-02-15
a firearm subsequent to the conviction for the felony or other crime, as specified in sub. (1)(a) or (b
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=321474 - 2021-02-15