Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4081 - 4090 of 63609 for records/1000.
Search results 4081 - 4090 of 63609 for records/1000.
State v. Jesus Barbary
. Based on the record before us, we cannot conclude that the trial court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11590 - 2005-03-31
. Based on the record before us, we cannot conclude that the trial court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11590 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Daniel Sagert v. Waukesha County Treasurer
as the ownership … appears of record in the office of the register of deeds of the county in which the parcel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25151 - 2017-09-21
as the ownership … appears of record in the office of the register of deeds of the county in which the parcel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25151 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
error, and the circuit court failed to properly exercise its discretion on the record regarding its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=193784 - 2017-09-21
error, and the circuit court failed to properly exercise its discretion on the record regarding its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=193784 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Jesus Barbary
counsel at the county’s expense. Based on the record before us, we cannot conclude that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11590 - 2017-09-19
counsel at the county’s expense. Based on the record before us, we cannot conclude that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11590 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Steven H. Hoyme v. Janice S. Brakken
. STAT. § 814.025. Because the record supports the trial court’s decision, we affirm the order. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5444 - 2017-09-19
. STAT. § 814.025. Because the record supports the trial court’s decision, we affirm the order. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5444 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. The loan was secured with the Hoppas’ primary residence as collateral. The first mortgage was recorded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89261 - 2014-09-15
. The loan was secured with the Hoppas’ primary residence as collateral. The first mortgage was recorded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89261 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the circuit court failed to conduct an on- the-record colloquy). ¶2 As I explain, the State in its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=291051 - 2020-09-24
the circuit court failed to conduct an on- the-record colloquy). ¶2 As I explain, the State in its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=291051 - 2020-09-24
COURT OF APPEALS
. The loan was secured with the Hoppas’ primary residence as collateral. The first mortgage was recorded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89261 - 2012-11-13
. The loan was secured with the Hoppas’ primary residence as collateral. The first mortgage was recorded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89261 - 2012-11-13
State v. William H. Roberts
was intoxicated. Looking at Roberts’ driving record, the deputy saw that Roberts had been convicted of OWI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4090 - 2005-03-31
was intoxicated. Looking at Roberts’ driving record, the deputy saw that Roberts had been convicted of OWI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4090 - 2005-03-31
State v. William H. Roberts
was intoxicated. Looking at Roberts’ driving record, the deputy saw that Roberts had been convicted of OWI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4089 - 2005-03-31
was intoxicated. Looking at Roberts’ driving record, the deputy saw that Roberts had been convicted of OWI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4089 - 2005-03-31