Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 40871 - 40880 of 63428 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 40871 - 40880 of 63428 for Motion for joint custody.
COURT OF APPEALS
granted WSRC’s motions, dismissing Waukesha’s answer and entering default judgment against Waukesha
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85105 - 2012-07-18
granted WSRC’s motions, dismissing Waukesha’s answer and entering default judgment against Waukesha
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85105 - 2012-07-18
2007 WI App 233
an order denying his motion to suppress physical evidence seized during a search of his home
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30158 - 2007-11-27
an order denying his motion to suppress physical evidence seized during a search of his home
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30158 - 2007-11-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
motion without a hearing and that the trial evidence was insufficient to support his conviction. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=369916 - 2021-05-25
motion without a hearing and that the trial evidence was insufficient to support his conviction. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=369916 - 2021-05-25
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
granted WSRC’s motions, dismissing Waukesha’s No. 2011AP453 4 answer and entering default
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85105 - 2014-09-15
granted WSRC’s motions, dismissing Waukesha’s No. 2011AP453 4 answer and entering default
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85105 - 2014-09-15
Carol Keip v. James Nicewander
of her husband. The trial court denied various pretrial, trial and post-trial dismissal motions brought
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2791 - 2005-03-31
of her husband. The trial court denied various pretrial, trial and post-trial dismissal motions brought
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2791 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
.’s parental rights to J.M. ¶4 C.J.T. filed a motion for a new trial on two grounds: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=151200 - 2017-09-21
.’s parental rights to J.M. ¶4 C.J.T. filed a motion for a new trial on two grounds: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=151200 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
The parties filed cross-motions for summary judgment. The circuit court determined that the undisputed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=955505 - 2025-06-25
The parties filed cross-motions for summary judgment. The circuit court determined that the undisputed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=955505 - 2025-06-25
COURT OF APPEALS
. The plaintiffs appeal an order granting the motion of the District and Employers Mutual Casualty Company[1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30403 - 2007-09-26
. The plaintiffs appeal an order granting the motion of the District and Employers Mutual Casualty Company[1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30403 - 2007-09-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
witness, detailing each witness’s proposed testimony. Banas opposed the motion. ¶4 At the other-acts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=619692 - 2023-02-08
witness, detailing each witness’s proposed testimony. Banas opposed the motion. ¶4 At the other-acts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=619692 - 2023-02-08
[PDF]
State v. Garland Hampton
) whether the trial court erred when it denied his double jeopardy motion to dismiss arising out
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10257 - 2017-09-20
) whether the trial court erred when it denied his double jeopardy motion to dismiss arising out
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10257 - 2017-09-20