Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 40931 - 40940 of 68969 for had.
Search results 40931 - 40940 of 68969 for had.
Barron County v. Brian T.
.[2] Brian had anticipated that he would earn $10,000 to $12,000 more than that his first year
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4620 - 2005-03-31
.[2] Brian had anticipated that he would earn $10,000 to $12,000 more than that his first year
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4620 - 2005-03-31
City of Milwaukee v. Thaddeus J. Derynda
of Derynda’s building. Derynda counterclaimed, alleging that he had made repairs ordered by the City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4638 - 2005-03-31
of Derynda’s building. Derynda counterclaimed, alleging that he had made repairs ordered by the City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4638 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
William J. Dekker v. Dennis M. Wergin
. The Wergins had bought the property from Dekker. In 1990, the judgment of foreclosure was entered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11692 - 2017-09-20
. The Wergins had bought the property from Dekker. In 1990, the judgment of foreclosure was entered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11692 - 2017-09-20
Albert L. Otto v. Nancy Kremer
was served on March 17. The Ladysmith branch, formerly known as MidAmerica Bank, had recently been acquired
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15883 - 2005-03-31
was served on March 17. The Ladysmith branch, formerly known as MidAmerica Bank, had recently been acquired
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15883 - 2005-03-31
Terry Locke v. Town of Menasha
A. Krueger, Robert Sokolowski and Jerry Lingnofski. The issue on appeal is whether the Town had authority
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10733 - 2005-03-31
A. Krueger, Robert Sokolowski and Jerry Lingnofski. The issue on appeal is whether the Town had authority
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10733 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
objected to continuing in Krueger’s absence. In response, the court stated that if Krueger came in and had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56774 - 2010-11-15
objected to continuing in Krueger’s absence. In response, the court stated that if Krueger came in and had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56774 - 2010-11-15
State v. Loren L. Leiser
, and in the interest of justice. The trial court summarily denied this—his third postconviction motion—because he had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25141 - 2006-05-15
, and in the interest of justice. The trial court summarily denied this—his third postconviction motion—because he had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25141 - 2006-05-15
2008 WI APP 163
of reconfinement is illegal because he had not completed his extended supervision for an earlier conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34240 - 2008-11-11
of reconfinement is illegal because he had not completed his extended supervision for an earlier conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34240 - 2008-11-11
COURT OF APPEALS
for speeding. When officers patted down Hicks, they found cocaine in his pocket. Hicks stated that he had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30039 - 2007-08-20
for speeding. When officers patted down Hicks, they found cocaine in his pocket. Hicks stated that he had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30039 - 2007-08-20
State v. Feleipe Harris
. According to the record, Harris thought that El‑Amin had raped Harris's grandmother. Harris then beat El
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8629 - 2005-03-31
. According to the record, Harris thought that El‑Amin had raped Harris's grandmother. Harris then beat El
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8629 - 2005-03-31