Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4101 - 4110 of 17411 for Cost.
Search results 4101 - 4110 of 17411 for Cost.
[PDF]
Benedetta Balistrieri v. Joseph P. Balistrieri
judgment denying his request for costs and attorney’s fees based on its determination that Benedetta’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5367 - 2017-09-19
judgment denying his request for costs and attorney’s fees based on its determination that Benedetta’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5367 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Leah B. Hensiak
fine [was] necessarily appropriate,” and indicated that the minimum fine was $1,800 plus costs. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5802 - 2017-09-19
fine [was] necessarily appropriate,” and indicated that the minimum fine was $1,800 plus costs. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5802 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Frontsheet
quo, namely that the costs of maintaining it are too high. Counties bear not just the cost
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=525444 - 2022-05-24
quo, namely that the costs of maintaining it are too high. Counties bear not just the cost
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=525444 - 2022-05-24
State v. Leah B. Hensiak
that the minimum fine was $1,800 plus costs. He urged the trial court to impose “whatever fine would have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5802 - 2009-02-16
that the minimum fine was $1,800 plus costs. He urged the trial court to impose “whatever fine would have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5802 - 2009-02-16
[PDF]
NOTICE
, and that a signed victim impact statement which she provided regarding the cost of the abatement of Lawhorn’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29135 - 2014-09-15
, and that a signed victim impact statement which she provided regarding the cost of the abatement of Lawhorn’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29135 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and awarded costs to the Village. DISCUSSION ¶13 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144403 - 2017-09-21
and awarded costs to the Village. DISCUSSION ¶13 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144403 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Frontsheet
, with conditions. Accordingly, we grant his reinstatement petition. We impose the full costs of this proceeding
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=171050 - 2017-09-21
, with conditions. Accordingly, we grant his reinstatement petition. We impose the full costs of this proceeding
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=171050 - 2017-09-21
Daniel Substad v. Frances Thorson
judgment ordering American Family to pay Substad the $50,000 limits from the Thorson policy, plus costs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13105 - 2005-03-31
judgment ordering American Family to pay Substad the $50,000 limits from the Thorson policy, plus costs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13105 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was entitled to “all attorney’s fees and costs pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 701.1004(1) [2017-182], WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=276715 - 2020-08-11
was entitled to “all attorney’s fees and costs pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 701.1004(1) [2017-182], WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=276715 - 2020-08-11
[PDF]
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Judith A. Pinchar
the costs of the proceeding. ¶2 We adopt the referee's findings of fact and conclusions of law and agree
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16686 - 2017-09-21
the costs of the proceeding. ¶2 We adopt the referee's findings of fact and conclusions of law and agree
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16686 - 2017-09-21