Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4111 - 4120 of 8844 for divorce.
Search results 4111 - 4120 of 8844 for divorce.
[PDF]
Frontsheet
for unauthorized purposes; failing to appear on time for a divorce hearing and misrepresenting to a court why he
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=456620 - 2021-11-23
for unauthorized purposes; failing to appear on time for a divorce hearing and misrepresenting to a court why he
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=456620 - 2021-11-23
[PDF]
Susan Marie Melton v. Tedd Allen Melton
that the circuit court did not err, we affirm. ¶2 Susan and Tedd were divorced in 2001. They have two children
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6699 - 2017-09-20
that the circuit court did not err, we affirm. ¶2 Susan and Tedd were divorced in 2001. They have two children
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6699 - 2017-09-20
Burton Davis v. Elizabeth Schultz-Davis
. The action originates from a judgment of divorce between Burton Davis (hereinafter, Burton) and Elizabeth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9985 - 2005-03-31
. The action originates from a judgment of divorce between Burton Davis (hereinafter, Burton) and Elizabeth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9985 - 2005-03-31
Laura K. Waterhouse v. Thomas A. Waterhouse
. Background ¶2 Laura and Thomas Waterhouse were divorced in June 1998. At that time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18094 - 2005-05-09
. Background ¶2 Laura and Thomas Waterhouse were divorced in June 1998. At that time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18094 - 2005-05-09
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. No. 2017AP389 2 After Pelzek and Wampole divorced, Pelzek had primary placement of two
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=205880 - 2017-12-18
. No. 2017AP389 2 After Pelzek and Wampole divorced, Pelzek had primary placement of two
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=205880 - 2017-12-18
COURT OF APPEALS
of the judgment divorcing her from Jeffrey Olsen. She specifically challenges two evidentiary decisions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51548 - 2010-06-30
of the judgment divorcing her from Jeffrey Olsen. She specifically challenges two evidentiary decisions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51548 - 2010-06-30
[PDF]
Age at disposition: Statewide
%) 78 (98%) 117 (99%) 83 (99%) 127 (100%) 15 Divorce 19700 780 (4%) 392 (6%) 7142 (42%) 8093 (83%) 1041
/publications/statistics/circuit/docs/agedispostate16.pdf - 2017-03-07
%) 78 (98%) 117 (99%) 83 (99%) 127 (100%) 15 Divorce 19700 780 (4%) 392 (6%) 7142 (42%) 8093 (83%) 1041
/publications/statistics/circuit/docs/agedispostate16.pdf - 2017-03-07
[PDF]
Begin Date:
%) 798 (98%) 122 (98%) 128 (99%) 102 (99%) 129 (100%) 15 Divorce 20832 838 (4%) 382 (6%) 7919 (44%) 7896
/publications/statistics/circuit/docs/agedispostate13.pdf - 2014-03-24
%) 798 (98%) 122 (98%) 128 (99%) 102 (99%) 129 (100%) 15 Divorce 20832 838 (4%) 382 (6%) 7919 (44%) 7896
/publications/statistics/circuit/docs/agedispostate13.pdf - 2014-03-24
[PDF]
Age at disposition: Statewide
%) 78 (99%) 96 (99%) 82 (99%) 116 (100%) 15 Divorce 17158 714 (4%) 355 (6%) 6725 (45%) 6384 (83%) 851
/publications/statistics/circuit/docs/agedispostate19.pdf - 2020-02-27
%) 78 (99%) 96 (99%) 82 (99%) 116 (100%) 15 Divorce 17158 714 (4%) 355 (6%) 6725 (45%) 6384 (83%) 851
/publications/statistics/circuit/docs/agedispostate19.pdf - 2020-02-27
[PDF]
Age at disposition: Statewide
%) 87 (98%) 126 (99%) 91 (99%) 123 (100%) 15 Divorce 18727 830 (4%) 345 (6%) 6982 (44%) 7434 (83%) 933
/publications/statistics/circuit/docs/agedispostate17.pdf - 2018-02-09
%) 87 (98%) 126 (99%) 91 (99%) 123 (100%) 15 Divorce 18727 830 (4%) 345 (6%) 6982 (44%) 7434 (83%) 933
/publications/statistics/circuit/docs/agedispostate17.pdf - 2018-02-09