Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 41211 - 41220 of 67825 for law.

[PDF] State v. Steven Wroten
, probative value, does not violate the principles of evidentiary or constitutional law. DeSantis, 155 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11690 - 2017-09-20

COURT OF APPEALS
the relevant facts, applied a proper standard of law, and, using a demonstrated rational process, reached
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82636 - 2012-05-16

SCS of Wisconsin, Inc. v. City of Oshkosh
issue of material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law, summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2916 - 2005-03-31

State v. Elijio M. Servantez
on the intoxicated driving charge as a matter of law. Correlatively, he argues that the acquittal on the BAC charge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6339 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
mistaken facts or an erroneous view of law. Id.; Duffy v. Duffy, 132 Wis. 2d 340, 343, 392 N.W.2d 115
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94977 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 13, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Cour...
the constitutional requirement of reasonableness is a question of law we review without deference. Id. ¶8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28123 - 2007-02-12

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of an ineffective assistance of counsel claim is a mixed question of fact and law. State v. Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109240 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] David Burch v. Village of Hammond
to the law; (3) the action was arbitrary, oppressive or unreasonable; and (4) the evidence presented
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5947 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Jose R.
or federal criminal law.”). He contends that his confession to the police was not voluntary. On October
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19172 - 2017-09-21

Archie F. Lange v. Ronald Tumm
. Raihle, Jr., of Raihle Law Office, Chippewa Falls. COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED May 31
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16309 - 2005-03-31