Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 41211 - 41220 of 58483 for speedy trial.
Search results 41211 - 41220 of 58483 for speedy trial.
David Fanello, Sr. v. Ralph Weisenberger
Weisenberger. The trial court concluded that the County and sheriff are immune from suit under Wis. Stat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4573 - 2005-03-31
Weisenberger. The trial court concluded that the County and sheriff are immune from suit under Wis. Stat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4573 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. STAT. RULE 809.21. After a jury trial, the circuit court sentenced Garcia-Vasquez to an eight-year
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=417992 - 2021-09-01
. STAT. RULE 809.21. After a jury trial, the circuit court sentenced Garcia-Vasquez to an eight-year
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=417992 - 2021-09-01
[PDF]
State v. Irvin Stanley
his car arguing that the stop, search and arrest were illegal. The trial court denied the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9452 - 2017-09-19
his car arguing that the stop, search and arrest were illegal. The trial court denied the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9452 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. IOP VI(5)(a ) (Nov. 30, 2009) (“When the trial court’s decision was based upon a written opinion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1062702 - 2026-01-15
. IOP VI(5)(a ) (Nov. 30, 2009) (“When the trial court’s decision was based upon a written opinion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1062702 - 2026-01-15
Stephen J. Weissenberger v. William D. Ridgely
there is no evidence in the record to support the trial court’s conclusion, and therefore we reverse and remand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14241 - 2005-03-31
there is no evidence in the record to support the trial court’s conclusion, and therefore we reverse and remand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14241 - 2005-03-31
State v. Devaldis A. Garth
. The issue is whether the trial court properly denied his motion to suppress the evidence used to prosecute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3028 - 2005-03-31
. The issue is whether the trial court properly denied his motion to suppress the evidence used to prosecute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3028 - 2005-03-31
William E. Jensen v. Susan E. Jensen
and speculative. He contends this amount was not unreasonable and speculative because his trial testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18305 - 2005-05-25
and speculative. He contends this amount was not unreasonable and speculative because his trial testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18305 - 2005-05-25
Robert E. Moss v. Mt. Morris Mutual Insurance Company
, the trial court concluded as a matter of law that the Mosses breached the contract by refusing to allow
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7730 - 2005-03-31
, the trial court concluded as a matter of law that the Mosses breached the contract by refusing to allow
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7730 - 2005-03-31
State v. William G. Campbell
precedent. Accordingly, the decision of the trial court is affirmed. On April 15
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10664 - 2005-03-31
precedent. Accordingly, the decision of the trial court is affirmed. On April 15
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10664 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
is “‘a fact or set of facts highly relevant to the imposition of sentence, but not known to the trial judge
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94400 - 2013-03-26
is “‘a fact or set of facts highly relevant to the imposition of sentence, but not known to the trial judge
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94400 - 2013-03-26