Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 41281 - 41290 of 76901 for judgment for u s.
Search results 41281 - 41290 of 76901 for judgment for u s.
[PDF]
State v. Paul E. Magnuson
facility, as defined in s. 938.02(15m) . . . a secure detention facility, as defined in s. 938.02(16
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17390 - 2017-09-21
facility, as defined in s. 938.02(15m) . . . a secure detention facility, as defined in s. 938.02(16
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17390 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 16
attorney and upon a showing of probable cause under s. 968.12, a court shall issue a subpoena requiring
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27409 - 2014-09-15
attorney and upon a showing of probable cause under s. 968.12, a court shall issue a subpoena requiring
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27409 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI APP 164
and Michael S. Greiveldinger of Wisconsin Power and Light Company, Madison. There was oral argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=42781 - 2014-09-15
and Michael S. Greiveldinger of Wisconsin Power and Light Company, Madison. There was oral argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=42781 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Eugene Nichols v. Jon Litscher
of an adverse decision of the court of appeals pursuant to s. 808.10 within 30 days of the date
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16369 - 2017-09-21
of an adverse decision of the court of appeals pursuant to s. 808.10 within 30 days of the date
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16369 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, “Any person aggrieved by a decision specified in s. 227.52 shall be entitled to judicial review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=286762 - 2020-09-15
, “Any person aggrieved by a decision specified in s. 227.52 shall be entitled to judicial review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=286762 - 2020-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
orders under s. 48.345, 48.347, 48.357, 48.363, 48.365, 938.345, 938.357, 938.363 or 938.365
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=934263 - 2025-04-02
orders under s. 48.345, 48.347, 48.357, 48.363, 48.365, 938.345, 938.357, 938.363 or 938.365
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=934263 - 2025-04-02
[PDF]
Theodore Craig v. City of Beloit
and publication. If within the 60-day period a petition conforming to the requirements of s. 8.40 and signed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5715 - 2017-09-19
and publication. If within the 60-day period a petition conforming to the requirements of s. 8.40 and signed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5715 - 2017-09-19
Theodore Craig v. City of Beloit
of the pleader be made by motion: …. 7. Failure to join a party under s. 803.03. The circuit court also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5715 - 2005-03-31
of the pleader be made by motion: …. 7. Failure to join a party under s. 803.03. The circuit court also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5715 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
facts to the correct legal standard in a reasonable way. David S. v. Laura S., 179 Wis. 2d 114, 149-50
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94713 - 2013-03-26
facts to the correct legal standard in a reasonable way. David S. v. Laura S., 179 Wis. 2d 114, 149-50
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94713 - 2013-03-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. No. 2022AP141 8 H.N.’s dispositional order had expired prior to the extension hearing, and the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=745852 - 2023-12-28
. No. 2022AP141 8 H.N.’s dispositional order had expired prior to the extension hearing, and the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=745852 - 2023-12-28