Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 41711 - 41720 of 58492 for speedy trial.

Carl G. Nordholm v. Herlache Industrial Supply Co., Inc.
the same function as the trial court and our review is de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5239 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
for confinement of Ripp as a sexually violent person. At trial, the State presented two witnesses. Doctor
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134234 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] NOTICE
admitted she “tossed” the baby and also shook him. ¶5 The trial court’s ruling on a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32296 - 2014-09-15

[PDF]
. The case proceeded to a jury trial, and the jury found Rickerman guilty of the charged crime. ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=898626 - 2025-01-09

COURT OF APPEALS
trial lawyer provided ineffective assistance by failing to challenge the search of his home
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49838 - 2010-05-10

The Shelby Insurance Company v. Heritage Mutual Insurance Company
. The parties then filed trial briefs setting out their respective positions on coverage. The court held
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15181 - 2005-03-31

Selgren Development Corporation v. Wisconsin Department of Transportation
-wide storm detention facility.”[2] The DOT moved for summary judgment. The trial court granted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11720 - 2005-03-31

State v. Ray Lee Wimer
), concluded due process requires this finding. Wimer makes no showing this claim was raised at the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4416 - 2005-03-31

David Langreck v. Wisconsin Lawyers Mutual Insurance Company
the one-year period. At trial, the jury found that Day had been causally negligent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14267 - 2005-03-31

Albert L. Otto v. Nancy Kremer
, 525 N.W.2d 276 (Ct. App. 1994). On review, “this court will not disturb the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15883 - 2005-03-31