Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 41731 - 41740 of 82604 for order for a biological sample for drug testing.
Search results 41731 - 41740 of 82604 for order for a biological sample for drug testing.
[PDF]
NOTICE
to support a conviction, “the test is whether this court can conclude that the trier of fact could
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51566 - 2014-09-15
to support a conviction, “the test is whether this court can conclude that the trier of fact could
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51566 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Travis E. Blanks
of the test because we conclude that Blanks could not have been prejudiced by his trial counsel's failure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9874 - 2017-09-19
of the test because we conclude that Blanks could not have been prejudiced by his trial counsel's failure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9874 - 2017-09-19
State v. Travis E. Blanks
we move directly to the second prong of the test because we conclude that Blanks could not have been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9874 - 2005-03-31
we move directly to the second prong of the test because we conclude that Blanks could not have been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9874 - 2005-03-31
State v. Nate Wilson
determine that admission of the evidence was harmless. The test for determining harmless error is whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12529 - 2005-03-31
determine that admission of the evidence was harmless. The test for determining harmless error is whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12529 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
this presumption and proving bias.” Ibid. In assessing juror bias, we employ a two-step test. Id., 2011 WI 62
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123060 - 2014-10-06
this presumption and proving bias.” Ibid. In assessing juror bias, we employ a two-step test. Id., 2011 WI 62
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123060 - 2014-10-06
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
). “The question of what constitutes reasonable suspicion is a common sense test: under all the facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=185944 - 2017-09-21
). “The question of what constitutes reasonable suspicion is a common sense test: under all the facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=185944 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
constitutes reasonable suspicion is a common sense test: under all the facts and circumstances present
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181182 - 2017-09-21
constitutes reasonable suspicion is a common sense test: under all the facts and circumstances present
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181182 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
. (quoted source omitted). “The determination of reasonableness is a common sense test.” State v. Post
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143503 - 2015-06-24
. (quoted source omitted). “The determination of reasonableness is a common sense test.” State v. Post
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143503 - 2015-06-24
State v. Tyrone Price
of the statute. Instead, the judge reasoned that the five-year term is a “testing” period during which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15281 - 2005-03-31
of the statute. Instead, the judge reasoned that the five-year term is a “testing” period during which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15281 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the sufficiency of the evidence to support the jury’s verdict, the test is whether the evidence adduced
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=476656 - 2022-01-27
the sufficiency of the evidence to support the jury’s verdict, the test is whether the evidence adduced
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=476656 - 2022-01-27