Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 41891 - 41900 of 69155 for j o e y.

COURT OF APPEALS
a judgment of the circuit court for Polk County: MOLLY E. GALEWYRICK, Judge. Reversed and cause remanded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64062 - 2011-05-16

COURT OF APPEALS
in Industrial Roofing: “[W]e determine that it is an erroneous exercise of discretion for a [trial] court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35494 - 2009-02-09

COURT OF APPEALS
, the court stated: “[W]e are reluctant to conclude that the positioning of the officer’s car, together
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82806 - 2012-05-22

Rayford N. Drake v. Linda F. Fikes
). (“[W]e generally look for reasons to sustain discretionary determinations.”) The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10711 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
for Kenosha County: Bruce E. Schroeder, Judge. Affirmed. Before Blanchard, P.J., Lundsten
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131908 - 2014-12-17

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(e) (2021-22). All references to the Wisconsin Statutes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=800912 - 2024-05-14

State v. Steven W. Anderson
to defeat probable cause. See 1 Wayne R. LaFave, Search & Seizure § 3.2(e), at 483-84 (1978
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5136 - 2005-03-31

Thomas D. Champeau v. City of Milwaukee
: john e. McCORMICK, Judge. Reversed and cause remanded with directions. Before Wedemeyer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4254 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Fred C. Hageny, Jr. v. Edwin A. Schowalter
FRED C. HAGENY, JR., Plaintiff-Respondent, v. EDWIN A. SCHOWALTER and EDITH E
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10543 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] CA Blank Order
Supervised Living Facility 3099 E. Washington Ave. P.O. Box 7969 Madison, WI 53707-7969 You
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=638534 - 2023-03-28