Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4191 - 4200 of 12799 for se.
Search results 4191 - 4200 of 12799 for se.
[PDF]
Willmer Guillaume v. Larry Elvetici
that it was already damaged when Guillaume dropped it off. Both parties appeared pro se at the small claims hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7308 - 2017-09-20
that it was already damaged when Guillaume dropped it off. Both parties appeared pro se at the small claims hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7308 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
filed a pro se motion for sentence modification. He argued that a change in Department of Corrections
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=886419 - 2024-12-11
filed a pro se motion for sentence modification. He argued that a change in Department of Corrections
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=886419 - 2024-12-11
[PDF]
State v. Edward A. Bogart
. Before Brown, Nettesheim and Snyder, JJ. PER CURIAM. Edward A. Bogart appeals pro se from a trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9439 - 2017-09-19
. Before Brown, Nettesheim and Snyder, JJ. PER CURIAM. Edward A. Bogart appeals pro se from a trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9439 - 2017-09-19
State v. Rowlland R. Jackson
transcript, and neither the appellant's pro se brief nor the state's brief contains reference to a hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8840 - 2005-03-31
transcript, and neither the appellant's pro se brief nor the state's brief contains reference to a hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8840 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
filed a pro se motion for sentence modification. He argued that a change in Department of Corrections
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=886419 - 2024-12-11
filed a pro se motion for sentence modification. He argued that a change in Department of Corrections
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=886419 - 2024-12-11
COURT OF APPEALS
Judge ¶1 PER CURIAM. Jose S. Soto, Sr., pro se, appeals an order denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134241 - 2015-02-02
Judge ¶1 PER CURIAM. Jose S. Soto, Sr., pro se, appeals an order denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134241 - 2015-02-02
[PDF]
State v. Maurice D. Harris
and Lundsten, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Maurice Harris, pro se, appeals judgments convicting him of felony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5765 - 2017-09-19
and Lundsten, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Maurice Harris, pro se, appeals judgments convicting him of felony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5765 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Kofi A. Easterling, pro se, appeals orders denying his motions to vacate a DNA surcharge imposed when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=64234 - 2014-09-15
. Kofi A. Easterling, pro se, appeals orders denying his motions to vacate a DNA surcharge imposed when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=64234 - 2014-09-15
State v. Anthony D. Taylor
and Mason, JJ.[1] ¶1 PER CURIAM. Anthony Taylor, pro se, appeals from the circuit court’s orders
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2298 - 2005-03-31
and Mason, JJ.[1] ¶1 PER CURIAM. Anthony Taylor, pro se, appeals from the circuit court’s orders
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2298 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
than the State had recommended. 4 While represented by counsel, Ahles filed a pro se petition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=303093 - 2020-11-11
than the State had recommended. 4 While represented by counsel, Ahles filed a pro se petition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=303093 - 2020-11-11