Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 421 - 430 of 45234 for Cost-effective.
Search results 421 - 430 of 45234 for Cost-effective.
Frontsheet
that Attorney Reitz should be required to pay the full costs of this proceeding, which are $2,701.40
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134425 - 2015-02-03
that Attorney Reitz should be required to pay the full costs of this proceeding, which are $2,701.40
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134425 - 2015-02-03
[PDF]
Scott K. Reed v. Brenda L. Bradley
underlying the rule is that the recovery of medical costs has a penal effect on a tortfeasor, who should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2274 - 2017-09-19
underlying the rule is that the recovery of medical costs has a penal effect on a tortfeasor, who should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2274 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
WI App 52
as to that question. Because the effect of our decision still entitles the Mayos to their jury award, we affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192384 - 2018-08-22
as to that question. Because the effect of our decision still entitles the Mayos to their jury award, we affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192384 - 2018-08-22
Frontsheet
restitution in the total amount of $21,580, and that he should be required to pay the full costs
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142926 - 2015-06-08
restitution in the total amount of $21,580, and that he should be required to pay the full costs
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142926 - 2015-06-08
[PDF]
Frontsheet
2 to pay the full costs of this disciplinary proceeding, which were $8,875.90 as of September
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142926 - 2017-09-21
2 to pay the full costs of this disciplinary proceeding, which were $8,875.90 as of September
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142926 - 2017-09-21
Frontsheet
was not licensed to practice law in Arizona. ΒΆ8 In response to the OLR complaint, Attorney Strizic effectively
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143347 - 2015-06-18
was not licensed to practice law in Arizona. ΒΆ8 In response to the OLR complaint, Attorney Strizic effectively
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143347 - 2015-06-18
[PDF]
Frontsheet
, Attorney Strizic effectively invoked two of the exceptions to reciprocal discipline under SCR 22.22(3
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143347 - 2017-09-21
, Attorney Strizic effectively invoked two of the exceptions to reciprocal discipline under SCR 22.22(3
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143347 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI 120
for the representation." 2 Former SCR 20:1.2(a), in effect prior to July 1, 2007, provided, in relevant part
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89817 - 2014-09-15
for the representation." 2 Former SCR 20:1.2(a), in effect prior to July 1, 2007, provided, in relevant part
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89817 - 2014-09-15
Frontsheet
that Attorney Gorokhovsky be publicly reprimanded and ordered to pay the costs of this proceeding, which totaled
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89817 - 2013-03-11
that Attorney Gorokhovsky be publicly reprimanded and ordered to pay the costs of this proceeding, which totaled
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89817 - 2013-03-11
Rita Roth v. City of Glendale
the health care provisions found in the collective bargaining agreements (CBAs) in effect at the time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13318 - 2005-03-31
the health care provisions found in the collective bargaining agreements (CBAs) in effect at the time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13318 - 2005-03-31