Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4221 - 4230 of 12912 for prosecuting.
Search results 4221 - 4230 of 12912 for prosecuting.
[PDF]
State v. Charles A. Dunlap
the incident with Dunlap happened. The court sustained the prosecution’s objection. ¶11 The final witness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15898 - 2017-09-21
the incident with Dunlap happened. The court sustained the prosecution’s objection. ¶11 The final witness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15898 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Bruce T. Davis
the Daniel H. No. 2004AP822-CR 16 burglary was not being prosecuted at the same time, or caused
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21587 - 2017-09-21
the Daniel H. No. 2004AP822-CR 16 burglary was not being prosecuted at the same time, or caused
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21587 - 2017-09-21
State v. William Carpenter
Jeopardy Clause protects against three distinct abuses: a second prosecution for the same offense after
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16927 - 2005-03-31
Jeopardy Clause protects against three distinct abuses: a second prosecution for the same offense after
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16927 - 2005-03-31
State v. William A. Schmidt
Jeopardy Clause protects against three distinct abuses: a second prosecution for the same offense after
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16931 - 2015-01-25
Jeopardy Clause protects against three distinct abuses: a second prosecution for the same offense after
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16931 - 2015-01-25
[PDF]
State v. Jackie Green
that “[a] transcript is not necessary for the prosecution of this appeal.” Because Green is the appellant, it is his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16209 - 2017-09-21
that “[a] transcript is not necessary for the prosecution of this appeal.” Because Green is the appellant, it is his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16209 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Kenneth M. W.
. EICH, C.J.1 Kenneth M. W. appeals from an order revoking a consent decree in a juvenile prosecution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9044 - 2017-09-19
. EICH, C.J.1 Kenneth M. W. appeals from an order revoking a consent decree in a juvenile prosecution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9044 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey Levasseur
has not shown the requisite bad faith. There is no evidence that the prosecution had bad-faith
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14038 - 2014-09-15
has not shown the requisite bad faith. There is no evidence that the prosecution had bad-faith
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14038 - 2014-09-15
State v. Derrell L. Garner
. The other two men gave responses the prosecutor deemed adverse to the prosecution. The trial court found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11385 - 2005-03-31
. The other two men gave responses the prosecutor deemed adverse to the prosecution. The trial court found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11385 - 2005-03-31
State v. Rhonda L. Ziegler
in an OMVWI prosecution. State v. Burkman, 96 Wis.2d 630, 642-643, 292 N.W.2d 641, 647 (1980
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10764 - 2005-03-31
in an OMVWI prosecution. State v. Burkman, 96 Wis.2d 630, 642-643, 292 N.W.2d 641, 647 (1980
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10764 - 2005-03-31
State v. Reginald E. Sims
contention that his tardy prosecution of this claim is excused because his counsel was dealing with charges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7545 - 2005-03-31
contention that his tardy prosecution of this claim is excused because his counsel was dealing with charges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7545 - 2005-03-31