Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 42231 - 42240 of 57152 for id.
Search results 42231 - 42240 of 57152 for id.
COURT OF APPEALS
or] she is not in contempt. Id. at 623 (citations omitted). ¶10 Here, the circuit court specifically
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68666 - 2011-07-27
or] she is not in contempt. Id. at 623 (citations omitted). ¶10 Here, the circuit court specifically
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68666 - 2011-07-27
COURT OF APPEALS
after the circuit court failed to consider all relevant factors under the statute. Id., ¶¶31, 35-36, 40
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32993 - 2008-06-11
after the circuit court failed to consider all relevant factors under the statute. Id., ¶¶31, 35-36, 40
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32993 - 2008-06-11
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
factors are relevant to the imposition of sentence and to determine the weight to assign to each. Id
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98930 - 2014-09-15
factors are relevant to the imposition of sentence and to determine the weight to assign to each. Id
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98930 - 2014-09-15
State v. David M. Womble
does not understand the nature of the constitutional rights he is waiving. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15294 - 2005-03-31
does not understand the nature of the constitutional rights he is waiving. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15294 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Phone Partners Limited Partnership v. C.F. Communications Corporation
approved, it is no more than a recommendation to the court. See id. at 638, 178 N.W.2d at 37. Approval
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8061 - 2017-09-19
approved, it is no more than a recommendation to the court. See id. at 638, 178 N.W.2d at 37. Approval
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8061 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Perry E. Hagler
for the ruling. Id. at 320, 477 N.W.2d at 88. We conclude that there is a reasonable basis in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11129 - 2017-09-19
for the ruling. Id. at 320, 477 N.W.2d at 88. We conclude that there is a reasonable basis in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11129 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
.” Id. at 690. To demonstrate prejudice, a defendant must show there is “a reasonable probability
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144424 - 2017-09-21
.” Id. at 690. To demonstrate prejudice, a defendant must show there is “a reasonable probability
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144424 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the offense and the rehabilitative needs of the defendant.” Id., ¶44 (citation omitted). However, a proper
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107796 - 2017-09-21
of the offense and the rehabilitative needs of the defendant.” Id., ¶44 (citation omitted). However, a proper
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107796 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
are the same. See id., ¶8 n.4. It contends that Henningsen waived his right to a prompt disposition when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237855 - 2019-03-21
are the same. See id., ¶8 n.4. It contends that Henningsen waived his right to a prompt disposition when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237855 - 2019-03-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
within the wide range of reasonable professional assistance.’” Id. (citation omitted). ¶13
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=396873 - 2021-07-28
within the wide range of reasonable professional assistance.’” Id. (citation omitted). ¶13
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=396873 - 2021-07-28