Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 42331 - 42340 of 84312 for case number.
Search results 42331 - 42340 of 84312 for case number.
[PDF]
Frontsheet
2021 WI 47 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2010AP1939-D COMPLETE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=370287 - 2021-05-25
2021 WI 47 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2010AP1939-D COMPLETE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=370287 - 2021-05-25
[PDF]
NOTICE
awarded Voss attorney fees based on the equities of the case pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 806.04(8), finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53888 - 2014-09-15
awarded Voss attorney fees based on the equities of the case pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 806.04(8), finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53888 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI App 82
2017 WI App 82 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2016AP1525
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=201069 - 2017-12-29
2017 WI App 82 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2016AP1525
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=201069 - 2017-12-29
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
2 ¶1 PER CURIAM. This case is before us for a second time. On June 16, 2011, Joan Kelly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=230465 - 2018-12-11
2 ¶1 PER CURIAM. This case is before us for a second time. On June 16, 2011, Joan Kelly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=230465 - 2018-12-11
Barbara Doyle v. Ronald A. Arthur
on Doyle’s motion to dismiss, which, if granted, would moot Arthur’s jurisdictional arguments in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13276 - 2005-03-31
on Doyle’s motion to dismiss, which, if granted, would moot Arthur’s jurisdictional arguments in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13276 - 2005-03-31
Donivan Molitor v. Rusk County Board of Adjustment
the law. We disagree and affirm the judgment. STATEMENT OF THE CASE ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3053 - 2005-03-31
the law. We disagree and affirm the judgment. STATEMENT OF THE CASE ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3053 - 2005-03-31
State v. Martin B., Sr.
will recite the additional facts and procedure about the case as we discuss each appellate issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7982 - 2005-03-31
will recite the additional facts and procedure about the case as we discuss each appellate issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7982 - 2005-03-31
Patricia M. Klinger v. Prudential Property and Casualty Insurance Company
2005 WI App 105 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2004AP1704
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17788 - 2005-05-24
2005 WI App 105 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2004AP1704
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17788 - 2005-05-24
Mark Shimkus v. Kenneth Sondalle
2000 WI App 238 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2229 - 2005-03-31
2000 WI App 238 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2229 - 2005-03-31
Luann M. Lawrence v. Wayman C. Lawrence
2004 WI App 170 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 03-1699 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6622 - 2005-03-31
2004 WI App 170 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 03-1699 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6622 - 2005-03-31