Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4271 - 4280 of 83320 for civil case no. "90-77".
Search results 4271 - 4280 of 83320 for civil case no. "90-77".
[PDF]
Caseload summary: Statewide
446873 20385 20385 2929 15669 Civil 17465 47567 48576 8104 8104 1568 18024 Divorce 13078 19627 19384 4804
/publications/statistics/circuit/docs/caseloadstate15.pdf - 2016-02-25
446873 20385 20385 2929 15669 Civil 17465 47567 48576 8104 8104 1568 18024 Divorce 13078 19627 19384 4804
/publications/statistics/circuit/docs/caseloadstate15.pdf - 2016-02-25
[PDF]
Caseload summary: Statewide
479598 20952 20952 2797 16371 Civil 17712 44545 46484 6787 6787 1533 17306 Divorce 13170 19115 19674 4009
/publications/statistics/circuit/docs/caseloadstate16.pdf - 2017-03-07
479598 20952 20952 2797 16371 Civil 17712 44545 46484 6787 6787 1533 17306 Divorce 13170 19115 19674 4009
/publications/statistics/circuit/docs/caseloadstate16.pdf - 2017-03-07
[PDF]
Caseload summary: Statewide
469800 17513 17513 3428 16855 Civil 17029 43954 45700 6238 6238 1270 16553 Divorce 12504 18563 18652 2921
/publications/statistics/circuit/docs/caseloadstate17.pdf - 2018-02-09
469800 17513 17513 3428 16855 Civil 17029 43954 45700 6238 6238 1270 16553 Divorce 12504 18563 18652 2921
/publications/statistics/circuit/docs/caseloadstate17.pdf - 2018-02-09
[PDF]
Caseload summary: statewide summary
434132 22233 22233 2530 15776 Civil 19748 48974 52674 5345 5345 1690 17738 Divorce 13340 19549 19675 3335
/publications/statistics/circuit/docs/caseloadstate14.pdf - 2015-03-05
434132 22233 22233 2530 15776 Civil 19748 48974 52674 5345 5345 1690 17738 Divorce 13340 19549 19675 3335
/publications/statistics/circuit/docs/caseloadstate14.pdf - 2015-03-05
[PDF]
Comments on Supreme Court rule petition 17-06 - Randall Nesbitt
engaged in primarily civil practice for the last 34 years, I am not personally affected by the rate
/supreme/docs/1706commentsnesbitt.pdf - 2018-04-27
engaged in primarily civil practice for the last 34 years, I am not personally affected by the rate
/supreme/docs/1706commentsnesbitt.pdf - 2018-04-27
[PDF]
Nathaniel Allen Lindell v. Matthew Frank
loan limit for another case he had pending and sent his certiorari papers to the court along
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6615 - 2017-09-19
loan limit for another case he had pending and sent his certiorari papers to the court along
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6615 - 2017-09-19
State v. Mark A. Johnson
because the June case had not yet been adjudicated. On March 15, 2002, Johnson was convicted on the June
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6392 - 2005-03-31
because the June case had not yet been adjudicated. On March 15, 2002, Johnson was convicted on the June
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6392 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Mark A. Johnson
because the June case had not yet been adjudicated. On March 15, 2002, Johnson was convicted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6392 - 2017-09-19
because the June case had not yet been adjudicated. On March 15, 2002, Johnson was convicted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6392 - 2017-09-19
Nathaniel Allen Lindell v. Matthew Frank
On December 27, 2002, Lindell was able to obtain an extension of his legal loan limit for another case he had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6615 - 2005-03-31
On December 27, 2002, Lindell was able to obtain an extension of his legal loan limit for another case he had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6615 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
without any factual support that the judge who presided over their case “has a history of denying jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=136485 - 2015-03-03
without any factual support that the judge who presided over their case “has a history of denying jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=136485 - 2015-03-03