Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 42701 - 42710 of 58492 for speedy trial.
Search results 42701 - 42710 of 58492 for speedy trial.
State v. Jackie C.
] On September 4, 2001, at the time set for jury trial on the petition, Jackie C. waived his right to a fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5342 - 2005-03-31
] On September 4, 2001, at the time set for jury trial on the petition, Jackie C. waived his right to a fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5342 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
recanting the sexual assault allegations. At trial, McNamara testified that, consistent with Lewallen’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30142 - 2014-09-15
recanting the sexual assault allegations. At trial, McNamara testified that, consistent with Lewallen’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30142 - 2014-09-15
Mark Hughes v. Stephen Puckett
. Immediately following the unsigned writ is the trial court’s “Memorandum Decision Dismissing Action,” in which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5313 - 2005-03-31
. Immediately following the unsigned writ is the trial court’s “Memorandum Decision Dismissing Action,” in which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5313 - 2005-03-31
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Bruce B. Jacobson
scheduling order. ¶11 The trial court scheduled the motions for a hearing on April 17, 2000
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18564 - 2005-06-13
scheduling order. ¶11 The trial court scheduled the motions for a hearing on April 17, 2000
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18564 - 2005-06-13
State v. Michael W. Farrell
of Farrell’s guilty pleas and scheduled a trial date for the NGI plea. On June 20
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13933 - 2005-03-31
of Farrell’s guilty pleas and scheduled a trial date for the NGI plea. On June 20
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13933 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
2 Because the trial court denied Anderson’s motion to suppress without a hearing, the facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72351 - 2014-09-15
2 Because the trial court denied Anderson’s motion to suppress without a hearing, the facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72351 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to proceed on that ground. 3 The court rescheduled the trial to begin on April 14, 2015
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=152708 - 2017-09-21
to proceed on that ground. 3 The court rescheduled the trial to begin on April 14, 2015
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=152708 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
with it. ¶4 After trial to the court, the circuit court awarded compensatory and exemplary damages, as well
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=83436 - 2014-09-15
with it. ¶4 After trial to the court, the circuit court awarded compensatory and exemplary damages, as well
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=83436 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
appeal under WIS. STAT. § 62.13(5)(i) provides for a new trial before the circuit court and is given
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=164139 - 2017-09-21
appeal under WIS. STAT. § 62.13(5)(i) provides for a new trial before the circuit court and is given
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=164139 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a postconviction motion seeking plea withdrawal. He alleged that his pleas were involuntary because trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=128640 - 2017-09-21
a postconviction motion seeking plea withdrawal. He alleged that his pleas were involuntary because trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=128640 - 2017-09-21