Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4301 - 4310 of 7645 for yes.
Search results 4301 - 4310 of 7645 for yes.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
answered, “Yes.” ¶12 The trial court found trial counsel’s testimony was credible and said “that even
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=71556 - 2014-09-15
answered, “Yes.” ¶12 The trial court found trial counsel’s testimony was credible and said “that even
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=71556 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
and everybody to go on this property,” the City responded, “Theoretically, yes.” Excerpted from the recording
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50755 - 2014-09-15
and everybody to go on this property,” the City responded, “Theoretically, yes.” Excerpted from the recording
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50755 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
? [ASSISTANT DISTRICT ATTORNEY]: Yes. THE COURT: [Defense Attorney?] [DEFENSE ATTORNEY]: I know he’s—he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138975 - 2015-04-07
? [ASSISTANT DISTRICT ATTORNEY]: Yes. THE COURT: [Defense Attorney?] [DEFENSE ATTORNEY]: I know he’s—he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138975 - 2015-04-07
COURT OF APPEALS
, Walker answered, “Yes.” ¶12 The trial court found trial counsel’s testimony was credible and said
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71556 - 2011-10-03
, Walker answered, “Yes.” ¶12 The trial court found trial counsel’s testimony was credible and said
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71556 - 2011-10-03
[PDF]
NOTICE
. Poupart testified that when he asked Galvan if he would submit to a blood test, Galvan responded “yes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=55130 - 2014-09-15
. Poupart testified that when he asked Galvan if he would submit to a blood test, Galvan responded “yes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=55130 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Jackie C.
.], is it your position today that Tyleesha was your child? [JACKIE C.]: Yes. …. [THE COURT]: And he has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5338 - 2017-09-19
.], is it your position today that Tyleesha was your child? [JACKIE C.]: Yes. …. [THE COURT]: And he has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5338 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that the -- what the judge will instruct you on this? JUROR: Yes, I do. [DEFENSE COUNSEL]: Is that neither
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=193647 - 2017-09-21
that the -- what the judge will instruct you on this? JUROR: Yes, I do. [DEFENSE COUNSEL]: Is that neither
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=193647 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Mark D. Pett
permitted the State to ask only if Pett had been convicted of crimes and, if Pett answered “yes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5726 - 2017-09-19
permitted the State to ask only if Pett had been convicted of crimes and, if Pett answered “yes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5726 - 2017-09-19
State v. Warren C. Walker
the answer is, unequivocally yes. ¶4 The portion of the rebuttal argument that Walker claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19426 - 2005-08-30
the answer is, unequivocally yes. ¶4 The portion of the rebuttal argument that Walker claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19426 - 2005-08-30
State v. Daniel Slaughter
that the February date was correct and the correction was intended for count one: MS. BLACKWOOD: Yes, I think
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8516 - 2005-03-31
that the February date was correct and the correction was intended for count one: MS. BLACKWOOD: Yes, I think
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8516 - 2005-03-31