Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 43121 - 43130 of 58595 for speedy trial.
Search results 43121 - 43130 of 58595 for speedy trial.
Lamonte Simmons v. Jeffrey Endicott
appeals from an order whereby the trial court affirmed a decision of the Adjustment Committee at Columbia
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7921 - 2005-03-31
appeals from an order whereby the trial court affirmed a decision of the Adjustment Committee at Columbia
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7921 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
level until his new business as an insurance salesman got off the ground. The trial court granted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42784 - 2009-10-28
level until his new business as an insurance salesman got off the ground. The trial court granted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42784 - 2009-10-28
COURT OF APPEALS
and other discovery the State would use at trial. ¶4 In April, Burkart failed to appear
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64627 - 2011-05-23
and other discovery the State would use at trial. ¶4 In April, Burkart failed to appear
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64627 - 2011-05-23
[PDF]
Andy Saltarikos v. Hart Donley
and Olkowski. Donley then sought and obtained a trial de novo. See WIS. STAT. § 799.207 (3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5164 - 2017-09-19
and Olkowski. Donley then sought and obtained a trial de novo. See WIS. STAT. § 799.207 (3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5164 - 2017-09-19
State v. Joshua F.D.
this disposition would be appropriate, we conclude that the trial court did not misuse its discretion.[2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9615 - 2005-03-31
this disposition would be appropriate, we conclude that the trial court did not misuse its discretion.[2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9615 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
City of Neenah v. Michael A. Bellin
and trial hearing on November 4, 1998, Gitter was the only witness. Gitter testified that on August 21
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15106 - 2017-09-21
and trial hearing on November 4, 1998, Gitter was the only witness. Gitter testified that on August 21
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15106 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
responsibility pursuant to § 48.415(6)(a). At trial, it was undisputed that C.R. had previously been adjudged
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238272 - 2019-03-27
responsibility pursuant to § 48.415(6)(a). At trial, it was undisputed that C.R. had previously been adjudged
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238272 - 2019-03-27
Winnebago County v. Paul M. Nigl
from both orders. ¶3 “The writ of coram nobis is a common law remedy which empowers the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6651 - 2005-03-31
from both orders. ¶3 “The writ of coram nobis is a common law remedy which empowers the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6651 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
is consistent with an update to the pattern jury instruction that went into effect after Flannery’s trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=982123 - 2025-07-15
is consistent with an update to the pattern jury instruction that went into effect after Flannery’s trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=982123 - 2025-07-15
CA Blank Order
determination begins “with the presumption that the trial court acted reasonably, and the defendant must show
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91315 - 2013-01-08
determination begins “with the presumption that the trial court acted reasonably, and the defendant must show
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91315 - 2013-01-08