Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 43281 - 43290 of 65562 for divorce records/1000.
Search results 43281 - 43290 of 65562 for divorce records/1000.
State v. Gorden V. Pemrich
review of the record, we are satisfied that the no merit report properly analyzes the issues it raises
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9597 - 2005-03-31
review of the record, we are satisfied that the no merit report properly analyzes the issues it raises
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9597 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
misrepresents the record. ETA’s letter brief explicitly requested that the court not issue a stay. Aside from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104447 - 2013-11-18
misrepresents the record. ETA’s letter brief explicitly requested that the court not issue a stay. Aside from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104447 - 2013-11-18
City of Madison v. Timothy J. Duffy
of the record discloses that the facts in Terry are analogous to what occurred here. In Terry, the Supreme
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16077 - 2005-03-31
of the record discloses that the facts in Terry are analogous to what occurred here. In Terry, the Supreme
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16077 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=718811 - 2023-10-24
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=718811 - 2023-10-24
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
denying his claim regarding his maximum discharge date. Based upon our review of the briefs and record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1088985 - 2026-03-10
denying his claim regarding his maximum discharge date. Based upon our review of the briefs and record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1088985 - 2026-03-10
COURT OF APPEALS
decision, “very disturbed by the fact that [Jimeca H.’s lawyer] testified that she keeps no written records
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32404 - 2008-04-14
decision, “very disturbed by the fact that [Jimeca H.’s lawyer] testified that she keeps no written records
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32404 - 2008-04-14
COURT OF APPEALS
,” the record provides otherwise. Schaar contends that his reimprisonment after revocation on the predicate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33010 - 2008-06-11
,” the record provides otherwise. Schaar contends that his reimprisonment after revocation on the predicate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33010 - 2008-06-11
State v. Tigerwolf Angelo Prey-Perez
had a long-standing record of antisocial and criminal behavior and had received a significant ten-year
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11728 - 2005-03-31
had a long-standing record of antisocial and criminal behavior and had received a significant ten-year
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11728 - 2005-03-31
Board of Attorneys Professional Responsibility v. Verlin H. Peckham
that was not in the record before us, including that the client from whom he borrowed money was a long-time friend
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17452 - 2005-03-31
that was not in the record before us, including that the client from whom he borrowed money was a long-time friend
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17452 - 2005-03-31
State v. David L. Fries
or to comment upon any facts in the record that might be relevant to it. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11602 - 2005-03-31
or to comment upon any facts in the record that might be relevant to it. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11602 - 2005-03-31