Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 43351 - 43360 of 58483 for speedy trial.
Search results 43351 - 43360 of 58483 for speedy trial.
COURT OF APPEALS
sobriety tests based only on the odor of intoxicants constitutes an unreasonable seizure. The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36845 - 2009-06-17
sobriety tests based only on the odor of intoxicants constitutes an unreasonable seizure. The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36845 - 2009-06-17
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in the trial court or on later appeal.’” Id., ¶23 (quoted source omitted). “However, the rule
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101687 - 2017-09-21
in the trial court or on later appeal.’” Id., ¶23 (quoted source omitted). “However, the rule
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101687 - 2017-09-21
State v. Jeremiah C.
was June 26, 2002. Katie contested the petition; after a court trial on April 15, 2002, the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5426 - 2005-03-31
was June 26, 2002. Katie contested the petition; after a court trial on April 15, 2002, the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5426 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
must be followed in all subsequent proceedings in the trial court or on later appeal.’” Id., ¶23
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101687 - 2013-09-09
must be followed in all subsequent proceedings in the trial court or on later appeal.’” Id., ¶23
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101687 - 2013-09-09
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
there is an issue of arguable merit as to whether trial counsel was ineffective for failing to timely file
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=756269 - 2024-01-31
there is an issue of arguable merit as to whether trial counsel was ineffective for failing to timely file
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=756269 - 2024-01-31
Brown County Department of Human Services v. Terrance M.
is Entitled to Judicial Substitution ¶11 The trial court ruled and the County now argues that Terrance’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7643 - 2005-03-31
is Entitled to Judicial Substitution ¶11 The trial court ruled and the County now argues that Terrance’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7643 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
with their mother and their mother’s relatives, which the circuit court heard extensive testimony about at trial.[5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46156 - 2010-01-25
with their mother and their mother’s relatives, which the circuit court heard extensive testimony about at trial.[5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46156 - 2010-01-25
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of contract and trespass against CWEC. ¶3 The evidence produced at a bench trial demonstrated that in 2005
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=177429 - 2017-09-21
of contract and trespass against CWEC. ¶3 The evidence produced at a bench trial demonstrated that in 2005
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=177429 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
in part on April 7, 2006. The jury trial commenced June 8, 2006
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31680 - 2014-09-15
in part on April 7, 2006. The jury trial commenced June 8, 2006
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31680 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
trial. The jury found him guilty on all but two of the charges. The court sentenced Taylor, and he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=205929 - 2017-12-20
trial. The jury found him guilty on all but two of the charges. The court sentenced Taylor, and he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=205929 - 2017-12-20