Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 43351 - 43360 of 58285 for speedy trial.
Search results 43351 - 43360 of 58285 for speedy trial.
State v. James R. Boardman
. On the morning of trial, Boardman entered into an agreement with the State, whereby he pled guilty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13084 - 2005-03-31
. On the morning of trial, Boardman entered into an agreement with the State, whereby he pled guilty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13084 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
remaining issues for trial were: (1) whether Jerome had made an initial $2,000 payment on the note
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103304 - 2013-10-21
remaining issues for trial were: (1) whether Jerome had made an initial $2,000 payment on the note
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103304 - 2013-10-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the petition in September 2021. B.M. acknowledged that she had experienced a full TPR trial and disposition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=846577 - 2024-09-10
of the petition in September 2021. B.M. acknowledged that she had experienced a full TPR trial and disposition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=846577 - 2024-09-10
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to and since the jury trial. Consequently, the court set the matter for a continued disposition hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74281 - 2014-09-15
to and since the jury trial. Consequently, the court set the matter for a continued disposition hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74281 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of those charges at the time of this trial, and (2) the other-acts evidence was unfairly prejudicial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209255 - 2018-03-07
of those charges at the time of this trial, and (2) the other-acts evidence was unfairly prejudicial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209255 - 2018-03-07
[PDF]
M&I Marshall & Ilsley Bank v. Richard W. Schlueter
, owing no deference to the trial court’s decision. Waters v. U.S. Fid. & Guar. Co., 124 Wis. 2d 275
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5104 - 2017-09-19
, owing no deference to the trial court’s decision. Waters v. U.S. Fid. & Guar. Co., 124 Wis. 2d 275
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5104 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Michael W. Farrell
then stated that the case would proceed on the basis of Farrell’s guilty pleas and scheduled a trial date
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13933 - 2014-09-15
then stated that the case would proceed on the basis of Farrell’s guilty pleas and scheduled a trial date
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13933 - 2014-09-15
Richard Wanta v. Frederic C. Mueller
issues of material fact entitling them to a trial on both claims. We conclude that there are genuine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4641 - 2005-03-31
issues of material fact entitling them to a trial on both claims. We conclude that there are genuine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4641 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
or going to trial for more than two years. The State argued this conduct demonstrated a lack of remorse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98448 - 2013-06-24
or going to trial for more than two years. The State argued this conduct demonstrated a lack of remorse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98448 - 2013-06-24
State v. Gary J. Schmidt
analysis to address Schmidt’s mistrial motion. In Knighten, the defendant wore ankle shackles at trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4611 - 2005-03-31
analysis to address Schmidt’s mistrial motion. In Knighten, the defendant wore ankle shackles at trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4611 - 2005-03-31