Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4341 - 4350 of 63199 for records.
Search results 4341 - 4350 of 63199 for records.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to make a sufficient record detailing their reasons for the sentence imposed.” Id., 255 Wis. 2d 662
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=71632 - 2014-09-15
to make a sufficient record detailing their reasons for the sentence imposed.” Id., 255 Wis. 2d 662
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=71632 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
reviewing the appellant’s brief and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1008154 - 2025-09-11
reviewing the appellant’s brief and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1008154 - 2025-09-11
[PDF]
State v. Larry D. Cook
and has elected not to respond. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10362 - 2017-09-20
and has elected not to respond. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10362 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
is a three-fold rationale for requiring sentencing courts to make a sufficient record detailing their reasons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71632 - 2011-10-03
is a three-fold rationale for requiring sentencing courts to make a sufficient record detailing their reasons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71632 - 2011-10-03
[PDF]
Brief Cover
§ 809.23 (3) (a) or (b); and (4) portions of the record essential to an understanding of the issues raised
/formdisplay/CA-150.pdf?formNumber=CA-150&formType=Form&formatId=2&language=en - 2021-06-30
§ 809.23 (3) (a) or (b); and (4) portions of the record essential to an understanding of the issues raised
/formdisplay/CA-150.pdf?formNumber=CA-150&formType=Form&formatId=2&language=en - 2021-06-30
State v. Raymond Sykes, Jr.
to it. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9055 - 2005-03-31
to it. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9055 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Byron D. Mitchell
the no merit report. After an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders, we conclude that any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11396 - 2017-09-19
the no merit report. After an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders, we conclude that any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11396 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
reviewing the appellant’s brief and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1008154 - 2025-09-11
reviewing the appellant’s brief and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1008154 - 2025-09-11
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the record, we conclude there is no arguable merit to any issue that could be raised
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181516 - 2017-09-21
review of the record, we conclude there is no arguable merit to any issue that could be raised
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181516 - 2017-09-21
[MS WORD]
CA-150: Brief Cover
unpublished opinion cited under § 809.23 (3) (a) or (b); and (4) portions of the record essential
/formdisplay/CA-150.doc?formNumber=CA-150&formType=Form&formatId=1&language=en - 2021-06-30
unpublished opinion cited under § 809.23 (3) (a) or (b); and (4) portions of the record essential
/formdisplay/CA-150.doc?formNumber=CA-150&formType=Form&formatId=1&language=en - 2021-06-30