Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 43521 - 43530 of 74990 for public records.
Search results 43521 - 43530 of 74990 for public records.
Andre Moore v. Lawrence R. Stahowiak
dismissing his writ of mandamus against Lawrence R. Stahowiak, record custodian at Oshkosh Correctional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11373 - 2005-03-31
dismissing his writ of mandamus against Lawrence R. Stahowiak, record custodian at Oshkosh Correctional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11373 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
Based upon our review of the briefs and the record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93740 - 2014-09-15
Based upon our review of the briefs and the record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93740 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the February 5, 2018 order states on its face that it is “final,” the record reflects that a judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=249699 - 2019-11-07
the February 5, 2018 order states on its face that it is “final,” the record reflects that a judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=249699 - 2019-11-07
[PDF]
Andre Moore v. Lawrence R. Stahowiak
of mandamus against Lawrence R. Stahowiak, record custodian at Oshkosh Correctional Institution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11373 - 2017-09-19
of mandamus against Lawrence R. Stahowiak, record custodian at Oshkosh Correctional Institution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11373 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
are to the 2023-24 version. No. 2025AP1959-NM 2 independent review of the record and the no-merit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1023939 - 2025-10-16
are to the 2023-24 version. No. 2025AP1959-NM 2 independent review of the record and the no-merit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1023939 - 2025-10-16
[PDF]
Philip Anderson v. Judith Leamy
. This court defers to the trial court’s findings of fact unless they are unsupported by the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14536 - 2017-09-21
. This court defers to the trial court’s findings of fact unless they are unsupported by the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14536 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Federated Mutual Insurance Company v. Parts Distributing, Inc.
ruling is unclear from the appellate record, this court must reverse and remand the matter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10882 - 2017-09-20
ruling is unclear from the appellate record, this court must reverse and remand the matter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10882 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
order “for the reasons set forth on the record at the time of the hearing.” Driessen now appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=61402 - 2014-09-15
order “for the reasons set forth on the record at the time of the hearing.” Driessen now appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=61402 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
are to the 2023-24 version. No. 2025AP1959-NM 2 independent review of the record and the no-merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1023939 - 2025-10-16
are to the 2023-24 version. No. 2025AP1959-NM 2 independent review of the record and the no-merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1023939 - 2025-10-16
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the record, and in doing so presents us with new substantive facts presumably not presented to the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208682 - 2018-02-21
of the record, and in doing so presents us with new substantive facts presumably not presented to the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208682 - 2018-02-21

