Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 43531 - 43540 of 75032 for judgment for us.
Search results 43531 - 43540 of 75032 for judgment for us.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that a testifying accomplice had received use immunity; and (2) object to the jury’s receipt of a phone record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204368 - 2017-12-05
that a testifying accomplice had received use immunity; and (2) object to the jury’s receipt of a phone record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204368 - 2017-12-05
COURT OF APPEALS
on “[a]ny other reasons justifying relief from the operation of the judgment,” so long as the motion is made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31024 - 2007-12-03
on “[a]ny other reasons justifying relief from the operation of the judgment,” so long as the motion is made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31024 - 2007-12-03
David A. Clark v. Gary R. McCaughtry
and represented its will rather than its judgment, and (4) the evidence was such that the agency might reasonably
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14507 - 2005-03-31
and represented its will rather than its judgment, and (4) the evidence was such that the agency might reasonably
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14507 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
supervision at the time he committed these crimes, his history of drug use, and the need to protect
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143492 - 2017-09-21
supervision at the time he committed these crimes, his history of drug use, and the need to protect
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143492 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
809.30 postconviction motion, and the judgment and order were affirmed on appeal. State v. Lewis, 2010
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=111421 - 2017-09-21
809.30 postconviction motion, and the judgment and order were affirmed on appeal. State v. Lewis, 2010
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=111421 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
challenged the judgment, entered on a jury’s verdicts, convicting him of first-degree reckless homicide
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=656059 - 2023-05-16
challenged the judgment, entered on a jury’s verdicts, convicting him of first-degree reckless homicide
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=656059 - 2023-05-16
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, but was not signed. However, even if it had been signed, the motion appeared to only ask us to grant relief
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=193800 - 2017-09-21
, but was not signed. However, even if it had been signed, the motion appeared to only ask us to grant relief
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=193800 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Linda Premeau v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
, 279 N.W.2d 248 (1979). We may not substitute our judgment for that of the commission
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2201 - 2017-09-19
, 279 N.W.2d 248 (1979). We may not substitute our judgment for that of the commission
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2201 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Frank C. Kesselring v. Ellen K. Kesselring
was not a final judgment and not proper for this appeal. We denied the motion for stay because Frank only
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5891 - 2017-09-19
was not a final judgment and not proper for this appeal. We denied the motion for stay because Frank only
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5891 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Hobbs did not timely pursue postconviction relief from his judgments of conviction. Instead, he filed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=943915 - 2025-04-22
. Hobbs did not timely pursue postconviction relief from his judgments of conviction. Instead, he filed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=943915 - 2025-04-22