Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 43641 - 43650 of 57607 for id.
Search results 43641 - 43650 of 57607 for id.
State v. Alan Thomas LaPean
charged.” Id. However, as noted above, § 971.39 concerns DPA’s involving the Department of Corrections
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7386 - 2005-03-31
charged.” Id. However, as noted above, § 971.39 concerns DPA’s involving the Department of Corrections
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7386 - 2005-03-31
City of Milwaukee v. Michael Frank Machnitzky
a criminal case with prejudice prior to the attachment of jeopardy. Id. at 585, 297 N.W.2d at 815-16
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12957 - 2005-03-31
a criminal case with prejudice prior to the attachment of jeopardy. Id. at 585, 297 N.W.2d at 815-16
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12957 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. James P. Sullivan
804 apply. Id. at 272, 554 N.W.2d at 238-39 (footnote omitted). Sullivan asserts that to decide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12789 - 2017-09-21
804 apply. Id. at 272, 554 N.W.2d at 238-39 (footnote omitted). Sullivan asserts that to decide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12789 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
sentencing factors, and to exercise its discretion in imposing a reasoned and reasonable sentence. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26959 - 2014-09-15
sentencing factors, and to exercise its discretion in imposing a reasoned and reasonable sentence. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26959 - 2014-09-15
CA Blank Order
court’s determination. Id., ¶¶16-17. Bransford first claims the circuit court erred because Wis. Stat
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141073 - 2015-04-28
court’s determination. Id., ¶¶16-17. Bransford first claims the circuit court erred because Wis. Stat
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141073 - 2015-04-28
COURT OF APPEALS
findings unless they are clearly erroneous. See id. The court’s findings are not clearly erroneous based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30986 - 2007-11-27
findings unless they are clearly erroneous. See id. The court’s findings are not clearly erroneous based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30986 - 2007-11-27
[PDF]
NOTICE
the constitutional standard. Id. The State concedes and we accept that the circuit court’s factual findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33523 - 2014-09-15
the constitutional standard. Id. The State concedes and we accept that the circuit court’s factual findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33523 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for the challenged conduct, are factual matters which we will not disturb unless clearly erroneous. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=66544 - 2014-09-15
for the challenged conduct, are factual matters which we will not disturb unless clearly erroneous. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=66544 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in the proceedings, as well as the complexity of the case. Id. at 19. Joni B. also stated a circuit court should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=159365 - 2017-09-21
in the proceedings, as well as the complexity of the case. Id. at 19. Joni B. also stated a circuit court should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=159365 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
acted correctly. See id. at 626, 405 N.W.2d at 345. ¶17 With these standards in mind, we will now
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121184 - 2014-09-15
acted correctly. See id. at 626, 405 N.W.2d at 345. ¶17 With these standards in mind, we will now
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121184 - 2014-09-15