Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4391 - 4400 of 58492 for speedy trial.
Search results 4391 - 4400 of 58492 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. STAT. § 48.415(2). J.D. contends that she is entitled to a new trial on the issue of whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218061 - 2018-08-23
. STAT. § 48.415(2). J.D. contends that she is entitled to a new trial on the issue of whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218061 - 2018-08-23
State v. Billye L. Massey
” convictions), and from a postconviction order summarily denying his motions for a new trial for trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25064 - 2006-05-08
” convictions), and from a postconviction order summarily denying his motions for a new trial for trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25064 - 2006-05-08
State v. Thomas Deffke
to § 948.40(1), Stats. Deffke claims that the trial court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10255 - 2005-03-31
to § 948.40(1), Stats. Deffke claims that the trial court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10255 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
. The issue is whether the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion in imposing a sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29623 - 2014-09-15
. The issue is whether the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion in imposing a sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29623 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Billye L. Massey
a postconviction order summarily No. 2004AP2248-CR 2 denying his motions for a new trial for trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25064 - 2017-09-21
a postconviction order summarily No. 2004AP2248-CR 2 denying his motions for a new trial for trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25064 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
, and Young was free to argue for a lesser sentence. The trial court accepted Young’s plea and found him
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106473 - 2014-01-07
, and Young was free to argue for a lesser sentence. The trial court accepted Young’s plea and found him
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106473 - 2014-01-07
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a prison sentence with the length left to the trial court’s discretion. The trial court conducted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=201619 - 2017-11-07
a prison sentence with the length left to the trial court’s discretion. The trial court conducted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=201619 - 2017-11-07
COURT OF APPEALS
motion. The issue is whether the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion in imposing a sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29623 - 2007-07-09
motion. The issue is whether the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion in imposing a sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29623 - 2007-07-09
[PDF]
NOTICE
for sentence modification. The issue is whether the trial court was improperly influenced by an altercation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34707 - 2014-09-15
for sentence modification. The issue is whether the trial court was improperly influenced by an altercation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34707 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
for postdisposition relief. The sole issue is whether the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion by using
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31883 - 2008-02-26
for postdisposition relief. The sole issue is whether the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion by using
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31883 - 2008-02-26