Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4391 - 4400 of 58492 for speedy trial.
Search results 4391 - 4400 of 58492 for speedy trial.
COURT OF APPEALS
motion. The issue is whether the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion in imposing a sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29623 - 2007-07-09
motion. The issue is whether the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion in imposing a sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29623 - 2007-07-09
[PDF]
NOTICE
for sentence modification. The issue is whether the trial court was improperly influenced by an altercation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34707 - 2014-09-15
for sentence modification. The issue is whether the trial court was improperly influenced by an altercation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34707 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
for postdisposition relief. The sole issue is whether the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion by using
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31883 - 2008-02-26
for postdisposition relief. The sole issue is whether the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion by using
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31883 - 2008-02-26
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a prison sentence with the length left to the trial court’s discretion. The trial court conducted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=201619 - 2017-11-07
a prison sentence with the length left to the trial court’s discretion. The trial court conducted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=201619 - 2017-11-07
CA Blank Order
, and Young was free to argue for a lesser sentence. The trial court accepted Young’s plea and found him
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106473 - 2014-01-07
, and Young was free to argue for a lesser sentence. The trial court accepted Young’s plea and found him
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106473 - 2014-01-07
[PDF]
State v. Izell W.
. § 948.02(1), and from the trial court’s order denying his motion for post-adjudication and post
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7028 - 2017-09-20
. § 948.02(1), and from the trial court’s order denying his motion for post-adjudication and post
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7028 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Thomas Deffke
to § 948.40(1), STATS. Deffke claims that the trial court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10255 - 2017-09-20
to § 948.40(1), STATS. Deffke claims that the trial court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10255 - 2017-09-20
State v. Dante Boston
an order denying his post‑conviction motion. Boston claims that the trial court erred in not holding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9392 - 2005-03-31
an order denying his post‑conviction motion. Boston claims that the trial court erred in not holding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9392 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Robert A. Settecase appeals from a trial court order upholding a jury verdict in favor of his former
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=739255 - 2023-12-12
. Robert A. Settecase appeals from a trial court order upholding a jury verdict in favor of his former
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=739255 - 2023-12-12
[PDF]
State v. Dante Boston
-conviction motion. Boston claims that the trial court erred in not holding a Miranda-Goodchild hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9392 - 2017-09-19
-conviction motion. Boston claims that the trial court erred in not holding a Miranda-Goodchild hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9392 - 2017-09-19