Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4391 - 4400 of 58492 for speedy trial.
Search results 4391 - 4400 of 58492 for speedy trial.
COURT OF APPEALS
motion. The issue is whether the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion in imposing a sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29623 - 2007-07-09
motion. The issue is whether the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion in imposing a sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29623 - 2007-07-09
[PDF]
NOTICE
for sentence modification. The issue is whether the trial court was improperly influenced by an altercation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34707 - 2014-09-15
for sentence modification. The issue is whether the trial court was improperly influenced by an altercation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34707 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
for postdisposition relief. The sole issue is whether the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion by using
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31883 - 2008-02-26
for postdisposition relief. The sole issue is whether the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion by using
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31883 - 2008-02-26
[PDF]
State v. Thomas Deffke
to § 948.40(1), STATS. Deffke claims that the trial court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10255 - 2017-09-20
to § 948.40(1), STATS. Deffke claims that the trial court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10255 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Izell W.
. § 948.02(1), and from the trial court’s order denying his motion for post-adjudication and post
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7028 - 2017-09-20
. § 948.02(1), and from the trial court’s order denying his motion for post-adjudication and post
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7028 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Frontsheet
judges presided over the trial, sentencing, and earlier motions in this case. But only
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251475 - 2020-02-07
judges presided over the trial, sentencing, and earlier motions in this case. But only
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251475 - 2020-02-07
State v. Dante Boston
an order denying his post‑conviction motion. Boston claims that the trial court erred in not holding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9392 - 2005-03-31
an order denying his post‑conviction motion. Boston claims that the trial court erred in not holding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9392 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Robert A. Settecase appeals from a trial court order upholding a jury verdict in favor of his former
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=739255 - 2023-12-12
. Robert A. Settecase appeals from a trial court order upholding a jury verdict in favor of his former
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=739255 - 2023-12-12
[PDF]
Edward Frank Finn v. Debra M. Finn
in maintenance for an indefinite term. She argues that the trial court misused its No. 99-0285-FT 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15081 - 2017-09-21
in maintenance for an indefinite term. She argues that the trial court misused its No. 99-0285-FT 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15081 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Dante Boston
-conviction motion. Boston claims that the trial court erred in not holding a Miranda-Goodchild hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9392 - 2017-09-19
-conviction motion. Boston claims that the trial court erred in not holding a Miranda-Goodchild hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9392 - 2017-09-19