Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 43951 - 43960 of 82702 for simple case.
Search results 43951 - 43960 of 82702 for simple case.
State v. Cindy Lou Kusisto
is entitled to have the enhanced parts of her sentences commuted pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 973.13 (“In any case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25613 - 2006-06-26
is entitled to have the enhanced parts of her sentences commuted pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 973.13 (“In any case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25613 - 2006-06-26
COURT OF APPEALS
-Naranjo bar in this case because Hall is not using a means available under state law to challenge a prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105358 - 2013-12-09
-Naranjo bar in this case because Hall is not using a means available under state law to challenge a prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105358 - 2013-12-09
[PDF]
State v. Nathan O. Jones
record and other records in the case. See Morones v. State, 61 Wis.2d 544, 552-53, 213 N.W.2d 31, 36
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14024 - 2014-09-15
record and other records in the case. See Morones v. State, 61 Wis.2d 544, 552-53, 213 N.W.2d 31, 36
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14024 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
her. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1107506 - 2026-04-22
her. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1107506 - 2026-04-22
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=936250 - 2025-04-03
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=936250 - 2025-04-03
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
defaulted, while the case proceeded to a jury trial against Parr and Anderson. The jury rendered its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143490 - 2017-09-21
defaulted, while the case proceeded to a jury trial against Parr and Anderson. The jury rendered its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143490 - 2017-09-21
Amusement Devices, Inc. v. State of Wisconsin Department of Revenue
a penalty for neglect. We affirm. ¶2 This case concerns whether Amusement Devices
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3246 - 2005-03-31
a penalty for neglect. We affirm. ¶2 This case concerns whether Amusement Devices
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3246 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
concurrently with the sentence for a bail jumping conviction imposed in another Oconto County case. Payne’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75275 - 2011-12-19
concurrently with the sentence for a bail jumping conviction imposed in another Oconto County case. Payne’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75275 - 2011-12-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
on our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=522185 - 2022-05-18
on our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=522185 - 2022-05-18
CA Blank Order
upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144676 - 2015-07-14
upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144676 - 2015-07-14