Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 441 - 450 of 58483 for speedy trial.
Search results 441 - 450 of 58483 for speedy trial.
Office of State Public Defenders v. Circuit Court for Dunn County
in violation of § 948.31(1)(c), Stats. Creaser was arraigned on January 23, 1998, and requested a speedy trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14125 - 2005-03-31
in violation of § 948.31(1)(c), Stats. Creaser was arraigned on January 23, 1998, and requested a speedy trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14125 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Office of State Public Defenders v. Circuit Court for Dunn County
a speedy trial within ninety days. The jury trial was scheduled for February 25, 1998, before Judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14125 - 2014-09-15
a speedy trial within ninety days. The jury trial was scheduled for February 25, 1998, before Judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14125 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
. Simmons, who had also requested a speedy trial, stated that while he wanted “to see both officers here
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29408 - 2007-06-18
. Simmons, who had also requested a speedy trial, stated that while he wanted “to see both officers here
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29408 - 2007-06-18
[PDF]
NOTICE
Lemke was not present. Simmons, who had also requested a speedy trial, stated that while he wanted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29408 - 2014-09-15
Lemke was not present. Simmons, who had also requested a speedy trial, stated that while he wanted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29408 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
trial when his trial counsel agreed to waive his speedy trial right, but the circuit court did not ask
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=253023 - 2020-01-28
trial when his trial counsel agreed to waive his speedy trial right, but the circuit court did not ask
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=253023 - 2020-01-28
[PDF]
NOTICE
. ¶4 On January 20, 2005, Hoeft filed a motion to dismiss his case, alleging a speedy trial violation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26638 - 2014-09-15
. ¶4 On January 20, 2005, Hoeft filed a motion to dismiss his case, alleging a speedy trial violation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26638 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
filed a motion to dismiss his case, alleging a speedy trial violation. At a March 29 hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26638 - 2006-10-02
filed a motion to dismiss his case, alleging a speedy trial violation. At a March 29 hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26638 - 2006-10-02
State v. Douglas S. Zunker
to that defect.[1] Zunker also argues that the delay in the preliminary hearing violated his speedy trial rights
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3602 - 2005-03-31
to that defect.[1] Zunker also argues that the delay in the preliminary hearing violated his speedy trial rights
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3602 - 2005-03-31
State v. John P. Krueger
to a speedy trial. Id. Krueger cites the dissent in Braunsdorf in support of the trial court's decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13010 - 2005-03-31
to a speedy trial. Id. Krueger cites the dissent in Braunsdorf in support of the trial court's decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13010 - 2005-03-31
State v. Anthony Kane
] pleas and alleges the violation of his right to a speedy trial. We conclude that the circuit court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15092 - 2005-03-31
] pleas and alleges the violation of his right to a speedy trial. We conclude that the circuit court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15092 - 2005-03-31