Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 441 - 450 of 58338 for speedy trial.
Search results 441 - 450 of 58338 for speedy trial.
State v. Christopher Lee Davis
to Wis. Stat. § 971.10," the "speedy trial" statute. Under section 971.10(3), a circuit court may in its
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16371 - 2005-03-31
to Wis. Stat. § 971.10," the "speedy trial" statute. Under section 971.10(3), a circuit court may in its
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16371 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
Lemke was not present. Simmons, who had also requested a speedy trial, stated that while he wanted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29408 - 2014-09-15
Lemke was not present. Simmons, who had also requested a speedy trial, stated that while he wanted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29408 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
. Simmons, who had also requested a speedy trial, stated that while he wanted “to see both officers here
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29408 - 2007-06-18
. Simmons, who had also requested a speedy trial, stated that while he wanted “to see both officers here
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29408 - 2007-06-18
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
trial when his trial counsel agreed to waive his speedy trial right, but the circuit court did not ask
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=253023 - 2020-01-28
trial when his trial counsel agreed to waive his speedy trial right, but the circuit court did not ask
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=253023 - 2020-01-28
COURT OF APPEALS
filed a motion to dismiss his case, alleging a speedy trial violation. At a March 29 hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26638 - 2006-10-02
filed a motion to dismiss his case, alleging a speedy trial violation. At a March 29 hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26638 - 2006-10-02
[PDF]
NOTICE
. ¶4 On January 20, 2005, Hoeft filed a motion to dismiss his case, alleging a speedy trial violation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26638 - 2014-09-15
. ¶4 On January 20, 2005, Hoeft filed a motion to dismiss his case, alleging a speedy trial violation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26638 - 2014-09-15
State v. Douglas S. Zunker
to that defect.[1] Zunker also argues that the delay in the preliminary hearing violated his speedy trial rights
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3602 - 2005-03-31
to that defect.[1] Zunker also argues that the delay in the preliminary hearing violated his speedy trial rights
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3602 - 2005-03-31
State v. John P. Krueger
to a speedy trial. Id. Krueger cites the dissent in Braunsdorf in support of the trial court's decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13010 - 2005-03-31
to a speedy trial. Id. Krueger cites the dissent in Braunsdorf in support of the trial court's decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13010 - 2005-03-31
State v. Anthony Kane
] pleas and alleges the violation of his right to a speedy trial. We conclude that the circuit court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15092 - 2005-03-31
] pleas and alleges the violation of his right to a speedy trial. We conclude that the circuit court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15092 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. Jobson contends that the trial court’s decision not to attach prejudice to the dismissal is an erroneous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34916 - 2006-03-19
. Jobson contends that the trial court’s decision not to attach prejudice to the dismissal is an erroneous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34916 - 2006-03-19