Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4401 - 4410 of 12873 for se.
Search results 4401 - 4410 of 12873 for se.
State v. Edward A. Bogart
pro se from a trial court order requiring him to pay child support for two children after finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9439 - 2005-03-31
pro se from a trial court order requiring him to pay child support for two children after finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9439 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
., Mangerson and Stark, JJ. No. 2013AP2195 2 ¶1 PER CURIAM. Ryan Bechard, pro se, appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=118673 - 2014-09-15
., Mangerson and Stark, JJ. No. 2013AP2195 2 ¶1 PER CURIAM. Ryan Bechard, pro se, appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=118673 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
: Daniel L. Konkol, Judge.[1] Affirmed. ¶1 FINE, J. Brian E. Davis appeals, pro se, an order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26670 - 2006-10-09
: Daniel L. Konkol, Judge.[1] Affirmed. ¶1 FINE, J. Brian E. Davis appeals, pro se, an order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26670 - 2006-10-09
COURT OF APPEALS
: Elliott M. Levine, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 SHERMAN, J.[1] Matthew Brakefield, pro se, appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88637 - 2012-10-24
: Elliott M. Levine, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 SHERMAN, J.[1] Matthew Brakefield, pro se, appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88637 - 2012-10-24
Town of Grand Chute v. Mark Harry Gabriel
pro se defense. This contention is almost specious. The record shows that the municipal court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12629 - 2005-03-31
pro se defense. This contention is almost specious. The record shows that the municipal court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12629 - 2005-03-31
State v. Michael Reyes
to “come on in,” not to enter the living room per se; and (4) consent to enter the living room
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12611 - 2005-03-31
to “come on in,” not to enter the living room per se; and (4) consent to enter the living room
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12611 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. Before Hoover, P.J., Peterson and Mangerson, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Georgia and Harry Hall, pro se
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87850 - 2012-10-09
. Before Hoover, P.J., Peterson and Mangerson, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Georgia and Harry Hall, pro se
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87850 - 2012-10-09
CA Blank Order
. Joseph C. Athans appeals pro se from an order denying his motion for sentence modification. Based on our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94400 - 2013-03-26
. Joseph C. Athans appeals pro se from an order denying his motion for sentence modification. Based on our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94400 - 2013-03-26
COURT OF APPEALS
counsel’s failure to discuss possible defenses is “per se deficient.” However, his motion does not identify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=124663 - 2014-10-20
counsel’s failure to discuss possible defenses is “per se deficient.” However, his motion does not identify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=124663 - 2014-10-20
State v. Anthony D. Taylor
and Mason, JJ.[1] ¶1 PER CURIAM. Anthony Taylor, pro se, appeals from the circuit court’s orders
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2298 - 2005-03-31
and Mason, JJ.[1] ¶1 PER CURIAM. Anthony Taylor, pro se, appeals from the circuit court’s orders
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2298 - 2005-03-31