Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 44031 - 44040 of 77233 for j o e y s.
Search results 44031 - 44040 of 77233 for j o e y s.
Door County v. Fredric Wittig
groundwater as any of the waters of the state, as defined in s. 281.01(18), occurring in a saturated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6603 - 2005-03-31
groundwater as any of the waters of the state, as defined in s. 281.01(18), occurring in a saturated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6603 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
No. 2015AP1124-CR 2 (“THC”) as a second/subsequent offense. See WIS. STAT. § 961.41(3g)(e) (2013- 14). 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=168024 - 2017-09-21
No. 2015AP1124-CR 2 (“THC”) as a second/subsequent offense. See WIS. STAT. § 961.41(3g)(e) (2013- 14). 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=168024 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
for Waukesha County: lee s. dreyfus, jr., Judge. Affirmed. Before Neubauer, C.J., Gundrum
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147073 - 2015-08-25
for Waukesha County: lee s. dreyfus, jr., Judge. Affirmed. Before Neubauer, C.J., Gundrum
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147073 - 2015-08-25
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
going south. “[E]vasion ... can properly give rise to reasonable suspicion when viewed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=172394 - 2017-09-21
going south. “[E]vasion ... can properly give rise to reasonable suspicion when viewed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=172394 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
the whereabouts of [James]’s phone during the period in question because it never pursued an investigation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=261858 - 2020-05-27
the whereabouts of [James]’s phone during the period in question because it never pursued an investigation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=261858 - 2020-05-27
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
: In the present case, the jury heard evidence that Yegg[e]r was positive that Mr. McCaa was the person [who
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106932 - 2017-09-21
: In the present case, the jury heard evidence that Yegg[e]r was positive that Mr. McCaa was the person [who
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106932 - 2017-09-21
State v. Everton Taylor
that the package was for “E.T.”; (9) the driver of the Mitsubishi did not “com[e] to a stop like most people come
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3438 - 2005-03-31
that the package was for “E.T.”; (9) the driver of the Mitsubishi did not “com[e] to a stop like most people come
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3438 - 2005-03-31
State v. Luis A. Trujillo
,” and then “motioned for her to stop” after “[s]he removed her shoes and started removing her blue jeans and underwear
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2531 - 2005-03-31
,” and then “motioned for her to stop” after “[s]he removed her shoes and started removing her blue jeans and underwear
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2531 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
“[e]stablish[ing] the defendant’s understanding of the nature of the crime with which he is charged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=55523 - 2014-09-15
“[e]stablish[ing] the defendant’s understanding of the nature of the crime with which he is charged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=55523 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, V. JOSEPH S. FERRARA, JR., RESPONDENT-APPELLANT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=147183 - 2017-09-21
, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, V. JOSEPH S. FERRARA, JR., RESPONDENT-APPELLANT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=147183 - 2017-09-21