Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 44091 - 44100 of 44722 for part.

[PDF] WI App 145
self-representation, “particularly where, as is the case here, the timing of the motion is part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72010 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
captured part of ” the spitting incident.5 ¶10 On Officer Harmsen’s way to the scene, his speed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=329192 - 2021-01-28

State v. Charles A. Wallace
privacy, if the officers intended to have Wallace bend over and spread his buttocks as a part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3441 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Lake City Corporation v. City of Mequon
the intent of the legislature. Section 236.13(1)(c) provides in pertinent part: “Approval
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16970 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Richard W. Delaney
, in relevant part, as follows: Sentence of repeater: (1) Definitions. As used in this section, unless
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16497 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
(1)(a)2.b. Here, the County relies in part on the letter Terry wrote in which he made references
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=772153 - 2024-03-06

[PDF] State v. Christopher Swiams
be reconfined in the Wisconsin State Prisons following the revocation of the extended-supervision part of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7279 - 2017-09-20

COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN
because of this, as I said…. At a minimum there’s been an indication on someone’s part that alternate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35418 - 2011-06-14

[PDF] State v. Charles A. Wallace
intended to have Wallace bend over and spread his buttocks as a part of their search, they should have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3441 - 2017-09-19

WI App 145 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2010AP435-CR Complete Title...
is part and parcel with the consideration of whether disruption would result if the motion was granted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72010 - 2011-11-28