Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 44331 - 44340 of 56185 for n y c.

[PDF] NOTICE
during the cross- examination of Dr. Tonsfeldt. He argues that under WIS. STAT. § 804.07(1)(c)2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39950 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
years old. The victim became pregnant. Welch pled guilty to second-degree sexual assault, a Class C
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251804 - 2020-01-02

[PDF] State v. Roger A. Urbick
1 This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to § 752.31(2)(c), STATS. No. 99-0048-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14964 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] NOTICE
IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT I IN RE THE COMMITMENT OF EDWIN C. WEST: STATE OF WISCONSIN
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53063 - 2014-09-15

County of Jefferson v. Leslie L. Crook
)(b)4, Stats. [1] This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to § 752.31(2)(c), Stats.
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10934 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
and order: 2022AP593-CR State of Wisconsin v. Peter C. Koziara (L.C. # 2021CF820
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=607849 - 2023-01-06

Brown County Human Services Department v. Connie D.
for terminating Connie’s parental rights. The verdict was therefore proper under the statute. C. Best Interests
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2354 - 2005-03-31

Brown County Human Services Department v. Connie D.
for terminating Connie’s parental rights. The verdict was therefore proper under the statute. C. Best Interests
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2355 - 2005-03-31

Brown County Human Services Department v. Connie D.
for terminating Connie’s parental rights. The verdict was therefore proper under the statute. C. Best Interests
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2356 - 2005-03-31

Brown County Human Services Department v. Connie D.
for terminating Connie’s parental rights. The verdict was therefore proper under the statute. C. Best Interests
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2357 - 2005-03-31