Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 44491 - 44500 of 58340 for speedy trial.
Search results 44491 - 44500 of 58340 for speedy trial.
COURT OF APPEALS
him. He also argues that he received ineffective assistance of trial counsel. We affirm. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68377 - 2011-07-25
him. He also argues that he received ineffective assistance of trial counsel. We affirm. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68377 - 2011-07-25
Outagamie County Dept. of Human Services v. Nicholas S.
to be advised of the consequences of their verdict, the trial court did not apply an incorrect standard of law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25953 - 2006-07-17
to be advised of the consequences of their verdict, the trial court did not apply an incorrect standard of law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25953 - 2006-07-17
State v. Andrew Cotton
of his plea to a county ordinance violation. We therefore affirm the judgment and order of the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4019 - 2005-03-31
of his plea to a county ordinance violation. We therefore affirm the judgment and order of the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4019 - 2005-03-31
Julie D. v. Derek P.
that the trial court is in the best position to make. We will not second guess its credibility decisions. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14238 - 2005-03-31
that the trial court is in the best position to make. We will not second guess its credibility decisions. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14238 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, the no-merit report discusses whether T.C. could pursue an arguably meritorious claim that his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=760113 - 2024-02-06
, the no-merit report discusses whether T.C. could pursue an arguably meritorious claim that his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=760113 - 2024-02-06
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. No. 2014AP253-CR 4 1. While the offender is awaiting trial; 2. While the offender is being tried
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140354 - 2017-09-21
. No. 2014AP253-CR 4 1. While the offender is awaiting trial; 2. While the offender is being tried
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140354 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
to the charge in this case. Pride demanded a jury trial. ¶4 At trial, Officer Osell testified that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33912 - 2008-09-02
to the charge in this case. Pride demanded a jury trial. ¶4 At trial, Officer Osell testified that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33912 - 2008-09-02
COURT OF APPEALS
violate Wis. St. 49.49(a)(1)(2)(3). …. The Trial Court erred by the prejudice nature of the Attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102464 - 2013-09-30
violate Wis. St. 49.49(a)(1)(2)(3). …. The Trial Court erred by the prejudice nature of the Attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102464 - 2013-09-30
CA Blank Order
. “Regardless of the extent of the trial court’s reasoning, we will uphold a discretionary decision
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143682 - 2015-06-30
. “Regardless of the extent of the trial court’s reasoning, we will uphold a discretionary decision
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143682 - 2015-06-30
State v. Linda T. Sobish
that the trial court properly denied the requested jury instruction and affirm. ¶2 “The submission
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3237 - 2005-03-31
that the trial court properly denied the requested jury instruction and affirm. ¶2 “The submission
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3237 - 2005-03-31