Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4451 - 4460 of 30126 for consulta de causas.
Search results 4451 - 4460 of 30126 for consulta de causas.
[PDF]
James A. Billington v. Wilbert C. Oldenhoff
809.18 (2001-02). 1 We affirm. ¶2 We review summary judgments de novo applying the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7217 - 2017-09-20
809.18 (2001-02). 1 We affirm. ¶2 We review summary judgments de novo applying the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7217 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Dorothy Coello v. Allstate Insurance Company
affirm the judgment. We review summary judgments de novo and will affirm if the record shows
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12712 - 2017-09-21
affirm the judgment. We review summary judgments de novo and will affirm if the record shows
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12712 - 2017-09-21
Joseph Cammarata v. Pheasant Run Partnership
. ¶3 Our review of the circuit court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo, and we use the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5416 - 2005-03-31
. ¶3 Our review of the circuit court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo, and we use the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5416 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
materially breached the terms of the plea agreement is a question of law that we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135168 - 2015-02-17
materially breached the terms of the plea agreement is a question of law that we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135168 - 2015-02-17
State v. De'Andrus N.
that we apply Wis. Stat. §§ 948.02(1) and 948.01(5)(a). Our review is de novo. State v. Setagord, 211
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6616 - 2005-03-31
that we apply Wis. Stat. §§ 948.02(1) and 948.01(5)(a). Our review is de novo. State v. Setagord, 211
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6616 - 2005-03-31
Frankie Groenke v. Town of Pewaukee Police Department
judgment to the defendants. ¶4 Our review of the circuit court’s grant of summary judgment is de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4468 - 2005-03-31
judgment to the defendants. ¶4 Our review of the circuit court’s grant of summary judgment is de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4468 - 2005-03-31
State v. Steven R. Plevak
the search was lawful, presents an issue of law that we review de novo. See State v. Krier, 165 Wis.2d 673
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15494 - 2005-03-31
the search was lawful, presents an issue of law that we review de novo. See State v. Krier, 165 Wis.2d 673
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15494 - 2005-03-31
Shirell Watkins, Sr. v. Gerald A. Berge
for Dane County: Robert De Chambeau, Judge. Affirmed. Before Dykman, Deininger
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25614 - 2006-06-21
for Dane County: Robert De Chambeau, Judge. Affirmed. Before Dykman, Deininger
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25614 - 2006-06-21
Eugene Cherry v. Donald Gudmanson
review prison disciplinary decisions de novo, and, consequently, any trial court errors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15925 - 2005-03-31
review prison disciplinary decisions de novo, and, consequently, any trial court errors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15925 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jorel T. Norwood
County: Robert P. Van de hey, Judge. Affirmed. Before Lundsten, P.J., Vergeront
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25452 - 2006-06-07
County: Robert P. Van de hey, Judge. Affirmed. Before Lundsten, P.J., Vergeront
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25452 - 2006-06-07