Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 44511 - 44520 of 58338 for speedy trial.
Search results 44511 - 44520 of 58338 for speedy trial.
Outagamie County Dept. of Human Services v. Nicholas S.
to be advised of the consequences of their verdict, the trial court did not apply an incorrect standard of law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25953 - 2006-07-17
to be advised of the consequences of their verdict, the trial court did not apply an incorrect standard of law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25953 - 2006-07-17
State v. Andrew Cotton
of his plea to a county ordinance violation. We therefore affirm the judgment and order of the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4019 - 2005-03-31
of his plea to a county ordinance violation. We therefore affirm the judgment and order of the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4019 - 2005-03-31
Julie D. v. Derek P.
that the trial court is in the best position to make. We will not second guess its credibility decisions. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14238 - 2005-03-31
that the trial court is in the best position to make. We will not second guess its credibility decisions. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14238 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, the no-merit report discusses whether T.C. could pursue an arguably meritorious claim that his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=760113 - 2024-02-06
, the no-merit report discusses whether T.C. could pursue an arguably meritorious claim that his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=760113 - 2024-02-06
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. No. 2014AP253-CR 4 1. While the offender is awaiting trial; 2. While the offender is being tried
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140354 - 2017-09-21
. No. 2014AP253-CR 4 1. While the offender is awaiting trial; 2. While the offender is being tried
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140354 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
convicting her, after a jury trial, of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of an intoxicant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46366 - 2010-01-27
convicting her, after a jury trial, of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of an intoxicant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46366 - 2010-01-27
COURT OF APPEALS
to the charge in this case. Pride demanded a jury trial. ¶4 At trial, Officer Osell testified that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33912 - 2008-09-02
to the charge in this case. Pride demanded a jury trial. ¶4 At trial, Officer Osell testified that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33912 - 2008-09-02
COURT OF APPEALS
violate Wis. St. 49.49(a)(1)(2)(3). …. The Trial Court erred by the prejudice nature of the Attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102464 - 2013-09-30
violate Wis. St. 49.49(a)(1)(2)(3). …. The Trial Court erred by the prejudice nature of the Attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102464 - 2013-09-30
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
misinterpreted testimony by his trial counsel about the extent to which Gronseth and his counsel discussed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=253589 - 2020-02-06
misinterpreted testimony by his trial counsel about the extent to which Gronseth and his counsel discussed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=253589 - 2020-02-06
CA Blank Order
when it failed to advise Wolfe of mandatory minimums, and whether trial counsel was ineffective
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102775 - 2013-10-08
when it failed to advise Wolfe of mandatory minimums, and whether trial counsel was ineffective
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102775 - 2013-10-08