Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 44651 - 44660 of 84312 for case number.
Search results 44651 - 44660 of 84312 for case number.
State v. Shawn C. Picotte
argument in this case. However, Swanson has been limited in its application
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10323 - 2005-03-31
argument in this case. However, Swanson has been limited in its application
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10323 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Kaukauna Area School District v. State of Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction
at 378. Each property owner has the right to make his own case for redistricting; each case stands
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10329 - 2017-09-20
at 378. Each property owner has the right to make his own case for redistricting; each case stands
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10329 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
misdemeanors across two cases. 2 Garcia’s appellate 1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219111 - 2018-09-19
misdemeanors across two cases. 2 Garcia’s appellate 1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219111 - 2018-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=216444 - 2018-08-01
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=216444 - 2018-08-01
[PDF]
State v. Robert P. Eggimann
in this case is a “technical” defect. Id. at ¶14. A technical defect does not thwart personal jurisdiction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2381 - 2017-09-19
in this case is a “technical” defect. Id. at ¶14. A technical defect does not thwart personal jurisdiction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2381 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
.1 Dean Andersen appeals from an order dismissing his case with prejudice as a sanction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85663 - 2014-09-15
.1 Dean Andersen appeals from an order dismissing his case with prejudice as a sanction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85663 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
dismissing his case with prejudice as a sanction for failure to comply with a court order and the denial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85663 - 2012-07-31
dismissing his case with prejudice as a sanction for failure to comply with a court order and the denial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85663 - 2012-07-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the briefs and record, we conclude at No. 2020AP178-FT 2 conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=341440 - 2021-03-02
of the briefs and record, we conclude at No. 2020AP178-FT 2 conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=341440 - 2021-03-02
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
indicating that it believed the proper amount of sentence credit for the intimidation case was 249 days
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=322379 - 2021-01-12
indicating that it believed the proper amount of sentence credit for the intimidation case was 249 days
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=322379 - 2021-01-12
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to “reopen” his 1989 criminal case so that his postconviction motion could be considered. We conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138236 - 2017-09-21
to “reopen” his 1989 criminal case so that his postconviction motion could be considered. We conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138236 - 2017-09-21