Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 44681 - 44690 of 74376 for a ha.

State v. Edward D. Anderson
whether a defendant’s constitutional right to a speedy trial has been violated, we consider a four-part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19746 - 2005-09-26

[PDF] WI APP 5
. The City of Fond du Lac Police Department has several such devices that it loans out to locations where
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31067 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] WI APP 63
, the Board has the power to “hear and authorize appeals for variances where owing to special conditions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36034 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Daniel J. Eagan
has appealed from a judgment convicting him of the first-degree intentional homicide of his former
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7745 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
. In Wisconsin, a defendant also has a statutory right to be present during his trial which is codified in Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29129 - 2007-05-21

Jerry Teague v. Bad River Band of the Lake Superior Tribe of Chippewa Indians
Reorganization Act of 1934, 25 U.S.C. § 476. The Band has created a tribal enterprise, the Bad River Casino
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14733 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
. The statute states in relevant part, “If a law enforcement officer has probable cause to believe
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32210 - 2008-03-25

State v. Daniel J. Eagan
. PER CURIAM. Daniel J. Eagan has appealed from a judgment convicting him of the first-degree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7745 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Shirley D. Anderson v. City of Milwaukee
original cap of $25,000). The legislature has since amended and renumbered the statute as § 893.80, STATS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7842 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. If we conclude that the defendant has not proved one prong, we need not address the other. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=190894 - 2017-09-21