Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 44811 - 44820 of 61989 for child support.

State v. Jason Luepke
170 (1981), to support his argument that the trial court must state reasons on the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2470 - 2005-03-31

Cheri S. v. Crystal C.
conclude that this reading supports the objectives of the Juvenile Justice Code: “to … equip juvenile
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13331 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
. Their testimony was supported by an audiotape recording of a conversation between Kittilstad and one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30417 - 2007-10-01

COURT OF APPEALS
no legal argument in support of that proposition, and it is not immediately obvious to us why Kulke could
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34590 - 2008-11-12

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
that it was important that restitution be made. The emphasis on this importance supports the conclusion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92603 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
reports that the State has provided evidence to support that amount. Therefore, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174214 - 2017-09-21

CA Blank Order
by the presentence investigation report did not support granting expunction. The court considered no improper
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144922 - 2015-07-27

State v. Chris M. Holland
but found other testimony of the witness not to be credible. Holland has not cited any cases to support his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17948 - 2005-03-31

State v. Jeremy Clark
that can support the verdict. Id. ¶4 Clark contends that no jury could have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5259 - 2012-09-10

COURT OF APPEALS
to support and spend time with his son. At the postconviction hearing, Vasquez-Ramos’ trial counsel stated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77997 - 2012-02-13