Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4491 - 4500 of 64450 for records/1000.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. § 809.19(1) and (2), and that does not cite the record or legal authority; I address her failure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=184843 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
as “Payback,” the detective consulted the Kenosha police department records under the name “Payback” and found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56128 - 2010-11-02

[PDF] NOTICE
police department records under the name “Payback” and found a record linking White to that name
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56128 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=177509 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
was coerced and his sentence is excessive. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170539 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
the record and counsel’s report, we conclude that there are no issues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109194 - 2017-09-21

State v. Christopher Phillip Ries
. The defendant must show some unreasonable or unjustifiable basis in the record for the sentence imposed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9620 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
appendix, filing a false appendix certification, citing to its appendix rather than the record, and filing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32150 - 2008-03-17

State v. Anthony Lee Tucker
for the denial of Tucker’s requests. ¶2 According to the appellate record, Tucker
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6602 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95891 - 2014-09-15