Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 45021 - 45030 of 68530 for did.
Search results 45021 - 45030 of 68530 for did.
Gelbert Martinez v. Jefferson Insurance
when the accident happened. Tom did not dispute Barry’s testimony at trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14465 - 2005-03-31
when the accident happened. Tom did not dispute Barry’s testimony at trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14465 - 2005-03-31
Zois Dertis v. Dimitrios Panagiotaras
action. Panagiotaras responds that Dertis did not make this argument in the circuit court. Dertis does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4295 - 2005-03-31
action. Panagiotaras responds that Dertis did not make this argument in the circuit court. Dertis does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4295 - 2005-03-31
State v. Bobby R. Williams
the trial court’s order granting Williams’s motion to withdraw his plea. Because the trial court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19729 - 2005-10-27
the trial court’s order granting Williams’s motion to withdraw his plea. Because the trial court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19729 - 2005-10-27
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey A. Huck
of trial counsel, and because the trial court did not erroneously exercise its discretion in excluding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15525 - 2017-09-21
of trial counsel, and because the trial court did not erroneously exercise its discretion in excluding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15525 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
court did not erroneously exercise its discretion in ordering nondisclosure, we affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31109 - 2007-12-10
court did not erroneously exercise its discretion in ordering nondisclosure, we affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31109 - 2007-12-10
COURT OF APPEALS
that increases the sentence did not violate the defendant’s double jeopardy protections). He tries to get around
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54587 - 2010-09-21
that increases the sentence did not violate the defendant’s double jeopardy protections). He tries to get around
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54587 - 2010-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
denying his motion for postconviction relief. Williams claims: (1) the police did not have reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92189 - 2013-01-28
denying his motion for postconviction relief. Williams claims: (1) the police did not have reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92189 - 2013-01-28
[PDF]
NOTICE
, the sheriff’s deputy did not have probable cause to stop his vehicle. We conclude there was probable cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28602 - 2014-09-15
, the sheriff’s deputy did not have probable cause to stop his vehicle. We conclude there was probable cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28602 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
alleged he was pressured by his attorney into accepting the plea agreement, he did not understand
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=139707 - 2017-09-21
alleged he was pressured by his attorney into accepting the plea agreement, he did not understand
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=139707 - 2017-09-21
State v. Debra Kerkman
as a parent did not nullify Tracy's status as a “victim of a crime.” The court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8818 - 2005-03-31
as a parent did not nullify Tracy's status as a “victim of a crime.” The court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8818 - 2005-03-31