Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 45051 - 45060 of 84312 for case number.
Search results 45051 - 45060 of 84312 for case number.
COURT OF APPEALS
of harassment at his home due to the prior case, as well as job losses. Hicks stated that, based on his prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90232 - 2014-01-13
of harassment at his home due to the prior case, as well as job losses. Hicks stated that, based on his prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90232 - 2014-01-13
[PDF]
State v. Eric J. Hendrickson
whether he was a sexually violent person; (2) the court erroneously instructed the jury the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6140 - 2017-09-19
whether he was a sexually violent person; (2) the court erroneously instructed the jury the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6140 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Christopher L. Combs
commitment. In each case, the trial court found there was no probable cause “to believe that the committed
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20655 - 2017-09-21
commitment. In each case, the trial court found there was no probable cause “to believe that the committed
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20655 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Robert L. Kruse
commitment. In each case, the trial court found there was no probable cause “to believe that the committed
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20654 - 2017-09-21
commitment. In each case, the trial court found there was no probable cause “to believe that the committed
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20654 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Terrence L. Webb
: And originally the case was charged as two counts, and originally there was not an enhancer provision charge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10964 - 2017-09-19
: And originally the case was charged as two counts, and originally there was not an enhancer provision charge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10964 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of harassment at his home due to the prior case, as well as job losses. Hicks stated that, based on his prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90232 - 2014-09-15
of harassment at his home due to the prior case, as well as job losses. Hicks stated that, based on his prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90232 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
National Bank of Milwaukee v. Mariner, 129 Wis. 544, 109 N.W. 574 (1906); but this case, too, is readily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75219 - 2011-12-14
National Bank of Milwaukee v. Mariner, 129 Wis. 544, 109 N.W. 574 (1906); but this case, too, is readily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75219 - 2011-12-14
State v. Andrew B. Lamont
raised the issue after the State rested its case. The defense filed an affidavit showing the subpoena
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12769 - 2005-03-31
raised the issue after the State rested its case. The defense filed an affidavit showing the subpoena
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12769 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
was ineffective. O’Keefe also contends that this court should remand this case for a new trial in the interest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72225 - 2011-10-12
was ineffective. O’Keefe also contends that this court should remand this case for a new trial in the interest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72225 - 2011-10-12
COURT OF APPEALS
. at 325. ¶5 Berry explained that, unlike the officer’s testimony in that case, in certain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29612 - 2007-07-04
. at 325. ¶5 Berry explained that, unlike the officer’s testimony in that case, in certain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29612 - 2007-07-04