Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4541 - 4550 of 90164 for w a v e.

State v. Charles A. Montgomery
, v. CHARLES A. MONTGOMERY, Defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8262 - 2005-03-31

State v. Augustin A. Pineda
that a search incident to arrest occur after the arrest. In State v. Swanson, the supreme court reasoned: “[W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2545 - 2005-03-31

State v. Carlos A. Merino
State of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Carlos
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6261 - 2005-03-31

State v. Jeffrey A. Huck
State of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Jeffrey A. Huck
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15525 - 2005-03-31

State v. Catina A. McCoy
, v. Catina A. McCoy, Defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10784 - 2005-03-31

State v. Rick A. Walz
State of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Rick A. Walz
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25623 - 2006-06-21

State v. Chad A. Klessig
, the standard for competency to stand trial. The Pickens court held as follows: "[W]e have concluded
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17035 - 2005-03-31

State v. Leroy A. Yench
, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Leroy A. Yench, Defendant-Appellant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3668 - 2005-03-31

State v. Leigh A. Pedretti
, v. Leigh A. Pedretti, Defendant-Appellant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12028 - 2005-03-31

State v. Cordell A. Bufford
, the State neglects to point out that the court made the following statement at the same time: “[W]e heard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2856 - 2005-03-31