Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 45421 - 45430 of 60169 for quit claim deed/1000.
Search results 45421 - 45430 of 60169 for quit claim deed/1000.
County of Sheboygan v. Michael L. Jacobsen
and defenses, including claimed violations of constitutional rights. See County of Racine v. Smith, 122 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4968 - 2005-03-31
and defenses, including claimed violations of constitutional rights. See County of Racine v. Smith, 122 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4968 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
(collectively referred to as Smith) appeal the dismissal of their small claims action against Timothy Patti
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131639 - 2014-12-16
(collectively referred to as Smith) appeal the dismissal of their small claims action against Timothy Patti
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131639 - 2014-12-16
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
exercised its sentencing discretion. There is no arguable merit to a claim that the circuit court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94784 - 2014-09-15
exercised its sentencing discretion. There is no arguable merit to a claim that the circuit court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94784 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Babe to review the potential claims of ineffective assistance of counsel set forth in the order
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=501694 - 2022-03-31
Babe to review the potential claims of ineffective assistance of counsel set forth in the order
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=501694 - 2022-03-31
[PDF]
Gerald Huffman v. Dorla Huffman
substantial marital debt payments while the divorce was pending. This claim is not supported by the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15605 - 2017-09-21
substantial marital debt payments while the divorce was pending. This claim is not supported by the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15605 - 2017-09-21
Florence County v. Brad Richtig
, claiming that the applicable statute provides a defense if the bus is moving. Section 346.48(1) provides
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13484 - 2005-03-31
, claiming that the applicable statute provides a defense if the bus is moving. Section 346.48(1) provides
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13484 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Randall A. Tetzner
of Tetzner’s claims are meritorious. First, Tetzner has shown no Brady violation. Under Brady, Tetzner
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13498 - 2017-09-21
of Tetzner’s claims are meritorious. First, Tetzner has shown no Brady violation. Under Brady, Tetzner
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13498 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Kenosha County v. Suburban Video, Inc.
by 1Suburban further claims that the alleged violation of an ordinance is a civil action. Because we decide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11670 - 2017-09-19
by 1Suburban further claims that the alleged violation of an ordinance is a civil action. Because we decide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11670 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
on February 15, 2009, without providing notice. Berman sued Blofeld in small claims, arguing Blofeld failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59371 - 2011-01-26
on February 15, 2009, without providing notice. Berman sued Blofeld in small claims, arguing Blofeld failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59371 - 2011-01-26
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
forfeited the right to raise nonjurisdictional defects and defenses, including claimed violations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=938713 - 2025-04-09
forfeited the right to raise nonjurisdictional defects and defenses, including claimed violations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=938713 - 2025-04-09