Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 45451 - 45460 of 69114 for he.
Search results 45451 - 45460 of 69114 for he.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that he did not have an opportunity to request the video of his test before it was destroyed because he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=397249 - 2021-07-27
that he did not have an opportunity to request the video of his test before it was destroyed because he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=397249 - 2021-07-27
COURT OF APPEALS
to have his conviction vacated and requesting a Machner[1] hearing. He alleged counsel was ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35560 - 2009-02-17
to have his conviction vacated and requesting a Machner[1] hearing. He alleged counsel was ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35560 - 2009-02-17
Waukesha County v. Albert A. Tadych
procedures under § 75.35(3), Stats. The trial court subsequently issued an order stating: “[t]he ordinance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7761 - 2005-03-31
procedures under § 75.35(3), Stats. The trial court subsequently issued an order stating: “[t]he ordinance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7761 - 2005-03-31
State v. Michael M. Longcore
offense operating a motor vehicle after revocation, contrary to § 343.44(1), Stats. He contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14556 - 2005-03-31
offense operating a motor vehicle after revocation, contrary to § 343.44(1), Stats. He contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14556 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
by referring to him as a “snitch” and saying that he should not be trusted. Koester argues that this conduct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=225836 - 2018-11-01
by referring to him as a “snitch” and saying that he should not be trusted. Koester argues that this conduct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=225836 - 2018-11-01
State v. Spring A. Long
a Machner hearing,[2] where trial counsel explained that he did not pursue motions challenging Long’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15730 - 2005-03-31
a Machner hearing,[2] where trial counsel explained that he did not pursue motions challenging Long’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15730 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to have one of his hands released so that he could take notes. Turner and his attorney ultimately
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=73203 - 2014-09-15
to have one of his hands released so that he could take notes. Turner and his attorney ultimately
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=73203 - 2014-09-15
Timothy J. Gross v. Gail M. Gross
support provisions of his divorce judgment. He argues in his pro se brief that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9009 - 2005-03-31
support provisions of his divorce judgment. He argues in his pro se brief that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9009 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
a Machner1 hearing. He alleged counsel was ineffective for failing to object to certain testimony from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35560 - 2014-09-15
a Machner1 hearing. He alleged counsel was ineffective for failing to object to certain testimony from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35560 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a record that he had previously gone over S.E.’s right to a jury trial with him. S.E.’s counsel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192365 - 2017-09-21
a record that he had previously gone over S.E.’s right to a jury trial with him. S.E.’s counsel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192365 - 2017-09-21