Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4561 - 4570 of 12424 for mr.
Search results 4561 - 4570 of 12424 for mr.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
contends that: [n]o one explained to Mr. Stynes what a presentence investigation was or to expect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=446743 - 2021-11-03
contends that: [n]o one explained to Mr. Stynes what a presentence investigation was or to expect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=446743 - 2021-11-03
[PDF]
NOTICE
. The court asked for the State’s position. The State: To be honest with the Court, my concerns about Mr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59567 - 2014-09-15
. The court asked for the State’s position. The State: To be honest with the Court, my concerns about Mr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59567 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Ontario D. Lowery
in the past, it stated that its purpose in doing so was “to rebut what Mr. Lowery is stating on the stand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4432 - 2017-09-19
in the past, it stated that its purpose in doing so was “to rebut what Mr. Lowery is stating on the stand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4432 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Mary H.
circumstances, the parent must be found unfit, see Mrs. R. v. Mr. and Mrs. B., 102 Wis. 2d 118, 136, 306 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2184 - 2017-09-19
circumstances, the parent must be found unfit, see Mrs. R. v. Mr. and Mrs. B., 102 Wis. 2d 118, 136, 306 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2184 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
the hearing, [J.B. Hunt] offered the testimony of Mr. William Thomas Edwards, a safety manager with [J.B. Hunt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31860 - 2008-02-19
the hearing, [J.B. Hunt] offered the testimony of Mr. William Thomas Edwards, a safety manager with [J.B. Hunt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31860 - 2008-02-19
State v. Keith Schroeder
a concession here that Mr. Schroeder will testify that yes, it was on his hard drive.” Schroeder testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15529 - 2005-03-31
a concession here that Mr. Schroeder will testify that yes, it was on his hard drive.” Schroeder testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15529 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
…. …. They weren’t here yesterday. They’re not here today…. I don’t know whether or not Mr. Davis is involved
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36279 - 2009-04-28
…. …. They weren’t here yesterday. They’re not here today…. I don’t know whether or not Mr. Davis is involved
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36279 - 2009-04-28
[PDF]
NOTICE
-CR 5 …. THE COURT: Mr. Zakowski, do you think that I have the authority to consider
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30632 - 2014-09-15
-CR 5 …. THE COURT: Mr. Zakowski, do you think that I have the authority to consider
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30632 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
on Mr. Eggenberger and the extent to which it impacted his behavior.” He contended this evidence would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102261 - 2013-09-23
on Mr. Eggenberger and the extent to which it impacted his behavior.” He contended this evidence would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102261 - 2013-09-23
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, “[I]t is clear that Mr. Rolain did not take the rules of supervision seriously and was doing what
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=996551 - 2025-08-14
, “[I]t is clear that Mr. Rolain did not take the rules of supervision seriously and was doing what
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=996551 - 2025-08-14