Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4591 - 4600 of 72983 for petition.

State v. Amany E.
a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See Wis. Stat. § 808.10 and Rule 809.62
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2244 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN
in the Wisconsin circuit courts, and on December 21, 2007, the petitioner filed an amended petition which
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31894 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CR-252; Order Modifying Court-Imposed Conditions of Extended Supervision 302.113(7m)
§302.113(7m), Wis. Stats. Case No. A Petition to modify the conditions of extended
/formdisplay/CR-252.pdf?formNumber=CR-252&formType=Form&formatId=2&language=en - 2021-07-01

Rules Hearing
40.03 in its entirety. The petitioners state the purpose of the petition is to end the double standard
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51797 - 2010-07-05

[PDF] SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN
in the Wisconsin circuit courts, and on December 21, 2007, the petitioner filed an amended petition which
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31894 - 2014-09-15

Gloria Coston v. Joseph P.
, was that of the conservator/petitioner, Ms. Petrie, relating only to the content of the petition and to Joseph P.’s finances
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12410 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Gloria Coston v. Joseph P.
, was that of the conservator/petitioner, Ms. Petrie, relating only to the content of the petition and to Joseph P.’s finances
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12410 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] 22-01 - Interested Persons Communication
from the petitioner or interested persons or entities. Any comment to the rule petition
/scrules/docs/2201_interestedpersons.pdf - 2022-07-11

[PDF] FICE OF COURT COMMISSIONERS
: Rule Petition 14-06, Petition to Amend Supreme Court Rules 22.001(2), 22.02(6)(c), 22.03(1), 22.25(3
/supreme/docs/1406publicletter.pdf - 2015-07-08

[PDF] 2023AP001399 - Senators Carpenter, Larson, Spreitzer, Hesselbein and Smith's Response to Motion for Scheduling Order
2022, raised in the PetitionersPetition for Original Action and supporting documents. Whether
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1399_0802senatorsresponse.pdf - 2023-10-16